Methodological Reflections on Monitoring Interactive Knowledge Creation during Farming Demonstrations by Means of Surveys and Observations

Abstract

During farming demonstrations, peer-to-peer learning is known to be more effective than technology transfer when encouraging farmers to consider adopting more sustainable farming practices. Interactive knowledge creation has the potential to create a stimulating peer-learning environment focusing on the use of hands-on activities, knowledge scaffolding, discussions and negotiation. This study investigated how insight can be gained about the interactive knowledge creation that occurs during farming demonstrations by monitoring and evaluating a diverse sample of farming demonstrations in Belgium, Spain and Denmark via surveys and observations originally designed for the AgriDemo-F2F project. The study found that the selected monitoring tools provided insight about how participants experienced specific interactive knowledge creation. However, several stumbling blocks were also identified in using the proposed tools to monitor these learning processes, including the monitoring of abstract concepts and the reluctance among farmers to respond to self-administered open-ended survey questions. Based on these learning points, several proposals were made to improve the monitoring process of interactive knowledge creation. This study confirms that the improved understanding of learning practices and their impact on actual change presents a challenge, but it is essential if the adoption of sustainable farming practices is to be increased.

Science and user‐based co‐development of a farmland earthworm survey facilitated using digital media: Insights and policy implications

“…In terms of learning outcomes, it is difficult to satisfy all end users (farmers and researchers) and customers of research (grant funders) when visual, verbal and digital communication is the preference of farmers, but written approaches (especially refereed publications) are the communication style expected from the scientific community (Aare et al, 2020). For example, local farmers asked questions about earthworms and pesticide levels on Broadbalk, the long‐term arable field experiment at Rothamsted.…”

Which Innovative Cropping System for Which Farmer? Supporting Farmers' Choices Through Collective Activities

“…For instance, some farmers chose to try another ICS the second year, although they were satisfied with the system they chose the first year. While peer-to-peer exchanges are known to have an impact on farmers' perceptions, with learning related to diverse perspectives (Chantre et al, 2015;Cooreman et al, 2018), the exchanges and the learning process enabled by them are difficult to accurately track and evaluate, especially regarding their direct effect in changing practices (Aare et al, 2020). Some of the farmers chose an ICS based on the knowledge they already had of it; either because they were familiar with the crop species involved, or because they were curious to try something new.…”