2006
DOI: 10.1108/14601060610707876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing innovation capability through relationship management and implications for performance

Abstract: Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to examine empirically the antecedents and consequences of innovativeness or innovation capability of logistics service providers (LSPs). In particular relationship orientation is examined as an antecedent to innovativeness that will in turn lead to higher levels of logistics service quality and firm performance. The outcomes aim at contributing towards understanding the main drivers of innovativeness and the outcomes of developing the capability to innovate. Design/method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
101
1
11

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
4
101
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several ways which managers may implement initially in order to present their commitment to the innovativeness development. But somehow, the adoption of organizational or administrative innovation is influenced by some factors including organization's culture, structure and climate (Kimberly & Evanisko, 1981;Lin, 2006;Panayides, 2006). Additionally, product innovation reflects changes in the end product or service offered by the organization, while process innovation represents changes in the way firms produce end products or services (Cooper, 1998;Utterback, 1996).…”
Section: The Multidimensions Of Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several ways which managers may implement initially in order to present their commitment to the innovativeness development. But somehow, the adoption of organizational or administrative innovation is influenced by some factors including organization's culture, structure and climate (Kimberly & Evanisko, 1981;Lin, 2006;Panayides, 2006). Additionally, product innovation reflects changes in the end product or service offered by the organization, while process innovation represents changes in the way firms produce end products or services (Cooper, 1998;Utterback, 1996).…”
Section: The Multidimensions Of Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive and meaningful relationship between the relationship competency and innovation shows that relationship is among the most important elements for business success in dynamic and constantly changing environments. The studies by Ramani and Kumar (2008) and Panayides (2006) suggest that customer relationship management (CRM) is one of the important elements for the development of the innovation capability (25 & 26). The positive and significant relationship between the learning competency and innovation indicates that organizational learning provides a context and the requirements for occurrence of innovation, hence improved performance and competitive advantages.…”
Section: Research Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lembaga keuangan hendaknya memiliki portofolio produk keuangan yang seimbang untuk mempertahankan dan melindungi posisi pasarnya, kinerja keuangannya dan persaingan masa yang akan datang. Berdasarkan pemikiran Akamavi (2005) dan Panayides (2006) dapat ditarik simpul pemikiran bahwa inovasi produk dan layanan mampu mendorong peningkatan kinerja bisnis, sehingga dapat diajukan hipotesa sebagai berikut;…”
Section: Hipotesis 8: Semakin Tinggi Derajat Inovasi Produk Dan Layanunclassified
“…Demikian juga Tsai (2010) menemukan bahwa semakin tinggi kapabilitas inovasi maka semakin tinggi kinerja bisnis. Panayides (2006) menyatakan bahwa semakin tinggi inovasi maka semakin tinggi kinerja. Oleh karena itu dapat disimpulkan bahwa semakin tinggi derajat inovasi produk dan layanan, semakin baik kinerja bisnis perusahaan.…”
Section: Analisisunclassified