2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing decision-making and cognitive impulse control with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC): A randomized and sham-controlled exploratory study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…tDCS neuromodulation of various targets has been increasingly applied in treatment research (e.g., to relieve major depression Meron et al, 2015), but it has also been used for experimental manipulation of neural networks to enhance or diminish specific cognitive functions or symptoms, including impulsivity. Anodal tDCS applied to the rIFG appears to reduce behavioral impulsivity (Cai et al, 2016; Cunillera et al, 2014; Ditye et al, 2012; Stramaccia et al, 2015), whereas anodal tDCS to the left OFC has been found to lead to a reduction in cognitive impulsivity (Ouellet et al, 2015). If behavioral and cognitive impulsivity are implicated in short-term risk for self-injurious thoughts and behaviors, tDCS may therefore have potential to become a new protocol for addressing these clinical outcomes, through targeting the respective underlying neural circuitry of these facets of impulsivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…tDCS neuromodulation of various targets has been increasingly applied in treatment research (e.g., to relieve major depression Meron et al, 2015), but it has also been used for experimental manipulation of neural networks to enhance or diminish specific cognitive functions or symptoms, including impulsivity. Anodal tDCS applied to the rIFG appears to reduce behavioral impulsivity (Cai et al, 2016; Cunillera et al, 2014; Ditye et al, 2012; Stramaccia et al, 2015), whereas anodal tDCS to the left OFC has been found to lead to a reduction in cognitive impulsivity (Ouellet et al, 2015). If behavioral and cognitive impulsivity are implicated in short-term risk for self-injurious thoughts and behaviors, tDCS may therefore have potential to become a new protocol for addressing these clinical outcomes, through targeting the respective underlying neural circuitry of these facets of impulsivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If behavioral impulsivity is a short-term prospective predictor of suicide attempts, for example, the rIFG may be implicated in proximal risk for this behavior (Aron et al, 2003; Winstanley et al, 2006). Similarly, to the degree that cognitive impulsivity prospectively predicts proximal risk for this outcome, the OFC may be of particular relevance (Ouellet et al, 2015; Winstanley et al, 2006, 2004). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cathodal stimulation increased choices of the highest rewards, but anodal stimulation induced choices affected less by anticipated rewards and more by recent negative reward prediction errors, indicating that the right FPC is involved in controlling both exploration and exploitation. Ouellet et al [42] studied decisionmaking and cognitive impulse control using tDCS. Anodal tDCS over orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) regardless of laterality increased advantageous decision-making and cognitive impulse control, compared to sham stimulation, indicating that controlling OFC by tDCS helps regulate impulsive behavior in psychiatric populations.…”
Section: Tdcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, tDCS influences and modulates risk-taking behaviors [5,12,18,19,47,82,83], choice modulation [46], delayed discounting [30], maladaptive decisionmaking [81], probabilistic guessing [29], moral judgment [37], sunk-cost effect [4], exploration-exploitation trade-offs [61], decision-making and cognitive impulse control [42], perception of space and time [79], dual-task performance [22], model-based learning [70], addiction [6,17,26,60,80], food craving [23,35], and perceptual decision-making [34].…”
Section: Tdcsmentioning
confidence: 99%