2016
DOI: 10.1109/tpds.2015.2489198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Collusion Resilience in Reputation Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In platforms that employ such reputation systems, network metrics can highlight collusive behaviour. For example, Shen et al present algorithms for collusion detection, which can minimise the risk of reputation misuse [35].…”
Section: Social Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In platforms that employ such reputation systems, network metrics can highlight collusive behaviour. For example, Shen et al present algorithms for collusion detection, which can minimise the risk of reputation misuse [35].…”
Section: Social Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collusive behaviour is a prevalent issue in systems where reputation can be accrued [1,35]. In general, such behaviour is characterised by two or more users cooperatively boosting their reputation by providing multiple high ratings to each other, while ignoring or giving low ratings to other users.…”
Section: Potential Collusive Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We can see that a disturbance 4 The setting of these cheating intensities should be reasonable considering the well accepted fact that the MCS is a relatively good community with a limited ratio of malicious behaviors (e.g. 4% in [17], or 10% in [18]). are correspondingly downgraded for at least 1.64%, 3.44% and 2.20%, respectively.…”
Section: B Impact Of General Cheating Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%