2014
DOI: 10.1002/pi.4753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancements of clay exfoliation in polymer nanocomposites using a chemical blowing agent

Abstract: A novel approach for the enhancement of clay exfoliation in melt‐processed polymer/clay nanocomposites is reported. As‐received organoclay is pre‐treated with a blowing agent resulting in nanocomposites with superior properties.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(71 reference statements)
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intercalated nanostructures exhibited between 2 and 7 clay layers per stack with an average of 3.2 clay layers per stack. Using a blowing agent treated organomodified montmorillonite resulted in more exfoliated clay/R-PS nanocomposites, which is in good agreement with our previous findings on neat PS (Istrate and Chen, 2014). Typically, intercalated/exfoliated nanostructures occur inside melt processed nanocomposites due to the shear forces that are present during melt blending and the interfacial interactions between the polymer matrix and clay minerals (Fornes and Paul, 2003;Paul and Robeson, 2008).…”
Section: Structuresupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The intercalated nanostructures exhibited between 2 and 7 clay layers per stack with an average of 3.2 clay layers per stack. Using a blowing agent treated organomodified montmorillonite resulted in more exfoliated clay/R-PS nanocomposites, which is in good agreement with our previous findings on neat PS (Istrate and Chen, 2014). Typically, intercalated/exfoliated nanostructures occur inside melt processed nanocomposites due to the shear forces that are present during melt blending and the interfacial interactions between the polymer matrix and clay minerals (Fornes and Paul, 2003;Paul and Robeson, 2008).…”
Section: Structuresupporting
confidence: 91%
“…7 By dispersing Clay in R-PE ( Fig 1C, Curve C1) the (001) diffraction peak shifted to slightly higher 2θ values indicating that conventional composites have formed. This is similar to the findings reported for neat Clay/PP composites and attributed to the immiscibility between the polymer and the organomodified montmorillonite and/or the degradation of the surfactant during melt processing (Chen and Evans, 2008;Istrate and Chen, 2014). Replacing the Clay with ADC-Clay, the XRD spectra ( Fig 1C, Curve C2) showed no significant (001) diffraction peaks between the 2θ values of 2° and 4°, where the (001) peaks for Clay ( Fig 1A, Curve A1), ADC-Clay ( Fig 1A, Curve A2) and Clay/R-PE ( Fig 1C, Curve C1) were previously encountered.…”
Section: Structuresupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations