2009
DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/22/9/095006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement of trapped field and total trapped flux on GdBaCuO bulk by the MMPSC+IMRA method

Abstract: The trapped field B P T (z) and the total trapped flux T (z) as a function of the distance z from the bulk surface have been measured on a GdBaCuO superconducting bulk of 45 mm in diameter, which was magnetized by a sequential pulsed field application (SPA) method, a modified multi-pulse technique with stepwise cooling (MMPSC), and a subsequent iterative magnetizing operation with gradually reduced pulse field amplitude (IMRA). A trapped field of B P T = 3.10 T was realized by the MMPSC method, which was highe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been experimentally proved that the multi-pulse technique can improve the trapped field of HTS bulks by PFM effectively. The multi-pulse techniques include successive pulsed-field application (SPA), iteratively magnetizing pulsed field method with reducing amplitude (IMRA), and multi-pulse technique with step-wise cooling (MPSC) [13], [14], [15], [16]. The increase of the trapped field by successive pulses is understood as a result of reducing temperature rise due to the existence of currents produced by previous pulses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been experimentally proved that the multi-pulse technique can improve the trapped field of HTS bulks by PFM effectively. The multi-pulse techniques include successive pulsed-field application (SPA), iteratively magnetizing pulsed field method with reducing amplitude (IMRA), and multi-pulse technique with step-wise cooling (MPSC) [13], [14], [15], [16]. The increase of the trapped field by successive pulses is understood as a result of reducing temperature rise due to the existence of currents produced by previous pulses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the effect of PFM was evaluated in terms of the final trapped field strength around the superconducting bulk [7], [8]. The usual objective is for the trapped field to be as large as possible.…”
Section: B Simulation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…FCM is undoubtedly the best general method, which has given the highest value of 17.24 T [7]. However, limited by practical applications, FCM is expected to be replaced by PFM because of its inexpensive experimental setup and potential magnetizing abilities [8]. For the application of the superconducting interface module in space, it has to be studied which one of the two magnetization conditions is more appropriate to meet the demands of the self stability.…”
Section: Superconducting Interface Modules Considering Magnetizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In PFM, the actuating current density was described by a half sinusoidal waveform shown in (8), and the interfacing current density still was given by the (7)…”
Section: A Modeling Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%