2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement of MBBR reactor efficiency using effective microorganism for treatment of wastewater containing diazinon by engineered Pseudomonas putida KT2440 with manganese peroxidase 2 gene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26,27 For example, diazinon was efficiently degraded by engineered P. putida KT2440 with a manganese peroxidase 2-encoding gene. 28 The insecticides chlorpyrifos and furadan were degraded by engineered P. putida KT2440 by introducing chlorpyrifos/carbofuran hydrolase genes. 29 Engineered P. putida KT2440 expressing acetate kinase, pyruvate decarboxylase, and alcohol dehydrogenase II was used to degrade 1,3-dichloroprop-1-ene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…26,27 For example, diazinon was efficiently degraded by engineered P. putida KT2440 with a manganese peroxidase 2-encoding gene. 28 The insecticides chlorpyrifos and furadan were degraded by engineered P. putida KT2440 by introducing chlorpyrifos/carbofuran hydrolase genes. 29 Engineered P. putida KT2440 expressing acetate kinase, pyruvate decarboxylase, and alcohol dehydrogenase II was used to degrade 1,3-dichloroprop-1-ene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…putida KT2440 have been used in environmental remediation because of their safety, adaptability, and efficiency. , For example, diazinon was efficiently degraded by engineered P. putida KT2440 with a manganese peroxidase 2-encoding gene . The insecticides chlorpyrifos and furadan were degraded by engineered P.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several previous studies identified OPs in the influents of WWTPs [8][9][10], to the best of our knowledge, practical solutions for treating OPs in AWWTPs have not been reported. Regarding OP removal, most studies have focused on individual unit processes, such as biological reactors, chemical oxidation (CO), and activated carbon (AC) adsorption, in laboratory-scale experiments using synthetic wastewater rather than real agrochemical wastewater (AW) [11][12][13][14]. Moreover, even in studies that apply the CO-activated sludge process (ASP), which has been recognized as a suitable process for treating wastewater containing toxic and refractory organic pollutants, such as AW, the removal of individual OPs has not been reported [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%