2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement of collection efficiency of inertial impactors using elliptical concave impaction plates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on simulation results with or without particle collection, the statistical Lagrangian particle-tracking (SLPT) model was used to calculate collection efficiency, as presented in Eq. (1) (Kim and Yook, 2011;Kim et al, 2014b;Lee et al, 2014;Park et al, 2015). Here, Δr = R in /(N in -1) is the distance between particles, R in is the inlet radius, N in is the number of particles arranged in the radial direction, r i = (i -1)Δr is the particle position in the radial direction from the center, i is the particle index and f i is the particle collection index.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on simulation results with or without particle collection, the statistical Lagrangian particle-tracking (SLPT) model was used to calculate collection efficiency, as presented in Eq. (1) (Kim and Yook, 2011;Kim et al, 2014b;Lee et al, 2014;Park et al, 2015). Here, Δr = R in /(N in -1) is the distance between particles, R in is the inlet radius, N in is the number of particles arranged in the radial direction, r i = (i -1)Δr is the particle position in the radial direction from the center, i is the particle index and f i is the particle collection index.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a study has been conducted by varying impaction plate geometry to improve collection efficiency (Tsai and Cheng, 1995). The cut-off size of an inertial impactor was reduced by using an impaction plate with a concave elliptical surface to decrease particle bounce (Kim and Yook, 2011;Kim et al, 2013). In order to capture smaller particles, a new stage was added between the last stage of the ELPI and the filter (Yli-Ojanperä et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the suggestions of Kim and Yook (2011), the 32 mm impaction plate shown in Figure 2 is offset into a counterbore by 3 mm. The sidewalls of this counter-bore are slightly angled to help further reduce particle loss by blow-off.…”
Section: Design Parameters Of the Basic Impactor Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsai and Cheng (1995) tested impaction plates of various shapes and showed that the particle bounce under heavy loading condition could be alleviated by modifying the impaction plate shape. Kim and Yook (2011) assumed the elliptical concave impaction plate and suggested the optimum range of the ratio of major axis length to minor axis length of the elliptical curvature, for reducing the cut-off size of the round-nozzle inertial impactor. These studies of Tsai and Cheng (1995) and Kim and Yook (2011) imply that the collection efficiency of inertial impactors could be enhanced by merely changing the impaction plate shape, that is, without varying the aerosol flow rate or nozzle size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for a longer time compared to the particles floating over the flat impaction plate, as discussed by Kim and Yook (2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%