2016
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/32/325301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement of a dynamic porous model considering compression-release hysteresis behavior: application to graphite

Abstract: Because of their shock wave attenuation properties, porous materials and foams are increasingly used for various applications such as graphite in the aerospace industry and polyurethane (PU) foams in biomedical engineering. For these two materials, the absence of residual compaction after compression and release cycles limits the efficiency of the usual numerical dynamic porous models such as Pα and POREQST. In this paper, we suggest a simple enhancement of the latter in order to take into account the compress… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present authors have recently studied the dynamic behavior of porous graphite under high or hypervelocity impacts of metallic plates and spheres [22][23][24][25][26][27]. On the one hand, for plate impact experiments, all the phenomena are one-dimensional.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present authors have recently studied the dynamic behavior of porous graphite under high or hypervelocity impacts of metallic plates and spheres [22][23][24][25][26][27]. On the one hand, for plate impact experiments, all the phenomena are one-dimensional.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expected resulting movement is indicated in figure 10 with yellow arrows. Introducing this behaviour in the simulations is not possible with POREQST, but an evolution of this model has been proposed to take this into account [27]. We expect that it will help the simulations to allow more quantitative comparison with experimental observations, especially the crater closure on the projectile path.…”
Section: R1mentioning
confidence: 99%