2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2014.6855119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced wall clutter mitigation for compressed through-the-wall radar imaging using joint Bayesian sparse signal recovery

Abstract: This paper addresses the problem of wall clutter mitigation in compressed sensing through-the-wall radar imaging, where a different set of frequencies is sensed at different antenna locations. A joint Bayesian sparse approximation framework is first employed to reconstruct all the signals simultaneously by exploiting signal sparsity and correlations between antenna signals. This is in contrast to previous approaches where the signal at each antenna location is reconstructed independently. Furthermore, to promo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in [16] it was shown that recovering radar signals jointly achieves better reconstruction accuracy than recovering each signal independently. Therefore, the joint Bayesian sparse framework is adopted here to estimate the signal coefficients x n .…”
Section: A Joint Signal Coefficient Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in [16] it was shown that recovering radar signals jointly achieves better reconstruction accuracy than recovering each signal independently. Therefore, the joint Bayesian sparse framework is adopted here to estimate the signal coefficients x n .…”
Section: A Joint Signal Coefficient Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these CS-based methods assume that the measurements are free from the front wall returns, or the latter have been removed using background subtraction [6]- [9]. Others combine wall clutter mitigation and image formation [13]- [16]. In [13], CS is firstly applied to recover the missing radar measurements and then a wall clutter mitigation method, using spatial filtering [17] or a subspace projection technique [18], is applied to remove the wall returns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In TWR imaging, most CS techniques [7][8][9][10][11] assume that the wall returns can be completely removed before applying CS, or a background scene is available for suppressing the wall reflections. Very recently, wall mitigation techniques were investigated in the CS context [12][13][14]. In compressed TWR sensing, the same frequency observations may not be available at different antennas due to competing wireless services, intentional interferences, or radar jamming [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, most existing CSbased approaches for wall-clutter mitigation are performed in two stages. In the first stage, the antenna signals are recovered from reduced data samples using ℓ1 minimization [12], joint Bayesian sparse approximation [13], or block-sparse estimation [14]. In the second stage, the wall reflections are removed by applying clutter mitigation techniques, such as spatial filtering [16], or subspace projection [17,18], prior to image formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, a sparse Bayesian recovery framework is employed for jointly estimating the coefficient vectors θ l,m since it is more suitable for the TWRI problem than other simultaneous recovery algorithms. 13 In the Bayesian model, the noise term in (11) is assumed to be zero-mean Gaussian with independent and identically distributed (i.i.d) components. Thus, the probability density function (pdf) of ǫ l,m can be expressed as…”
Section: Joint Signal Coefficient Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%