2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2016.7471909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radar imaging of stationary indoor targets using joint low-rank and sparsity constraints

Abstract: This paper introduces a joint low-rank and sparsity-based model to address the problem of wall-clutter mitigation in compressed through-the-wall radar imaging. The proposed model is motivated by two observations that wall reflections reside in a low-rank subspace, and target signals tend to be sparse. In the proposed approach, the task of segregating target returns from wall reflections is formulated as a joint low-rank and sparsity constrained optimization problem. Here, the low rank constraint is imposed on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can notice that our method produces slightly lower TCR than that of background subtraction method. On the other hand, our method clearly detected two targets, and the iterative soft thresholding approach [10] and SVD method [7] both missed the second target, shown in Fig. 10(b) and (d).…”
Section: B the Results Of Twr Imagingmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…One can notice that our method produces slightly lower TCR than that of background subtraction method. On the other hand, our method clearly detected two targets, and the iterative soft thresholding approach [10] and SVD method [7] both missed the second target, shown in Fig. 10(b) and (d).…”
Section: B the Results Of Twr Imagingmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…9(a). For a comparison purpose, the results of iterative soft thresholding method [10], background subtraction [1] and SVD method [7] are depicted in Fig. 9(b) to (d).…”
Section: B the Results Of Twr Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations