2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.107802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced sludge thermophilic anaerobic digestion performance by single-chambered microbial electrolysis cells under ammonia inhibition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high FAN concentration was due to the accumulation of VFA, and the high FAN concentration will increase pH and total alkalinity, which will subsequently lead to changes in the hydrolytic bacterial community [46]. FAN proportion in TAN is determined by temperature and pH [53]. Therefore, the FAN level of mesophilic digesters was significantly lower than that of thermophilic digesters (Figure 2).…”
Section: Digestion Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high FAN concentration was due to the accumulation of VFA, and the high FAN concentration will increase pH and total alkalinity, which will subsequently lead to changes in the hydrolytic bacterial community [46]. FAN proportion in TAN is determined by temperature and pH [53]. Therefore, the FAN level of mesophilic digesters was significantly lower than that of thermophilic digesters (Figure 2).…”
Section: Digestion Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing the changes in TAN and FAN levels in the control group (Figure 1e,f), it was found that the TAN and FAN levels in the thermophilic digesters were significantly higher than those in the mesophilic digesters, and with a wider variation range. This was because the thermophilic conditions promoted the degradation of nitrogen-rich substances and the solubility of organic matter in the co-substrate, resulting in more thorough organic matter degradation and a faster rate of TAN production [45]. The TAN level in the experimental group did not show a significant difference compared to the control group, but the FAN level in the experimental group was much lower than that in T0 of the control group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…FAN was present in TAN, which increased as the digestate pH a ature increased [29]. Compared with TAN, FAN had direct toxicity could penetrate microbial cell membranes, causing damage to enzy comparing the changes in TAN and FAN levels in the control group found that the TAN and FAN levels in the thermophilic digesters wer than those in the mesophilic digesters, and with a wider variation ran the thermophilic conditions promoted the degradation of nitrogen the solubility of organic ma er in the co-substrate, resulting in mo ma er degradation and a faster rate of TAN production [45]. The TA The TAN level in both the experimental and control groups was between 1500 and 2500 mg L −1 at the end of digestion (Figure 1c,d), indicating that all methanogens in this experiment might have been affected by ammonia inhibition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [108] studied single-chambered MECs combined with thermophilic anaerobic digesters for the digestion of ammonia-rich synthetic substrates and sludge under high FAN concentrations. The results showed that the highest methane yields from both the substrates were obtained at an applied voltage of 0.7 V as 25 and 97.8 mL g −1 VSS added for synthetic substrates and sludge, respectively.…”
Section: Adoption Of Emerging Technologies 621 Bioelectrochemical Tec...mentioning
confidence: 99%