2000
DOI: 10.1063/1.480715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced saturation coverages in adsorption–desorption processes

Abstract: Many experimental studies of protein deposition on solid surfaces involve alternating adsorption/desorption steps. In this paper, we investigate the effect of a desorption step (separating two adsorption steps) on the kinetics, the adsorbed-layer structure, and the saturation density. Our theoretical approach involves a density expansion of the pair distribution function and an application of an interpolation formula to estimate the saturation density as a function of the density at which the desorption proces… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other, more complex, adsorption models have been developed that more appropriately characterize protein adsorption processes, which include the effects of surface crowding and subsequent protein‐protein interactions, such as the random sequential adsorption (RSA) process as presented by Ramsden and coworkers, as well as effects due to protein cooperativity, clustering, and aggregation, as summarized in the excellent review article by Rabe et al These more appropriate models should be considered for the characterization of protein adsorption behavior rather than the Langmuir model.…”
Section: Actual Protein Adsorption Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other, more complex, adsorption models have been developed that more appropriately characterize protein adsorption processes, which include the effects of surface crowding and subsequent protein‐protein interactions, such as the random sequential adsorption (RSA) process as presented by Ramsden and coworkers, as well as effects due to protein cooperativity, clustering, and aggregation, as summarized in the excellent review article by Rabe et al These more appropriate models should be considered for the characterization of protein adsorption behavior rather than the Langmuir model.…”
Section: Actual Protein Adsorption Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These considerations motivate us to study the deposition and evaporation of hard objects with rigid boundaries on a substrate. While a deposition-only system, of the type studied in random sequential adsorption [9], can end up in a non-evolving jammed configuration, with the addition of evaporation, the system eventually reaches an equilibrium steady state with a density governed by the rates of deposition and evaporation [12][13][14][15][16][17]. While most of these studies have focussed on the kinetics of approach to steady state, in this paper, we are interested in the properties of the steady state itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our objective was to independently establish three key model parameters (C E Max , k a , k d ) using experimental data for the adsorption and desorption of enzyme from the rubisco stain bound to the dyed surface. Although there are more advanced and complex models for protein adsorption [48][49][50], for simplicity we used the Langmuir isotherm and found it to be adequate, particularly in light of the observed reversibility of enzyme adsorption (e.g., Fig. 4 washout).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%