The construction, fouling and enzymatic cleaning of a textile dye surface

Onaizi, Sagheer A.; He, Lizhong; Middelberg, Anton P. J.

doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2010.07.030

Cited by 34 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 61 publications

(66 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several advantages are obtained after enzymatic treatment on textile substrates, namely cleaning of the surface of the tissue, improved surface appearance, reduced tendency of pilling formation, improvement in touch and softening among others . Several investigations are still being conducted with the goal of translate this technology in different stages of textile processing . Because it is an environmentally friendly and gentle process, plasma discharge treatment is being studied in several applications together with enzymes.…”

Section: Enzymatic Treatmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Plasma Treatment in Textile Industry

Zille

Oliveira

Souto

2014

Plasma Process. Polym.

232

114

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Plasma technology applied to textiles is a dry, environmentally‐ and worker‐friendly method to achieve surface alteration without modifying the bulk properties of different materials. In particular, atmospheric non‐thermal plasmas are suited because most textile materials are heat sensitive polymers and applicable in a continuous processes. In the last years plasma technology has become a very active, high growth research field, assuming a great importance among all available material surface modifications in textile industry. The main objective of this review is to provide a critical update on the current state of art relating plasma technologies applied to textile industry.

show abstract

Section: Enzymatic Treatmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Plasma Treatment in Textile Industry

Zille

Oliveira

Souto

2014

Plasma Process. Polym.

232

114

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…charged head group of SDOBS molecule, both the area per molecule and surface tension decrease with an increase in salt concentration [12]. In this work, we have kept the buffer composition constant at 20 mM Na + phosphate buffer (pH 8.0, ionic strength 56 mM), the same condition we used in our previous studies on rubisco [11,[26][27][28].…”

Section: Interfacial Tension Of the Mixed Protein-surfactant Layersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of positional surfactant isomers for displacement of rubisco protein from the air–water interface

He¹,

Onaizi²,

Dimitrijev-Dwyer³

et al. 2011

Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Another model that can be used to estimate C 1 from the equilibrium surface tension data is the Langmuir-Szyszkowski model [26][27][28] (Eq. 2), which is derived from the Gibbs equation of state coupled with the Langmuir adsorption isotherm [29][30][31]:…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Benchmarking the Self‐Assembly of Surfactin Biosurfactant at the Liquid–Air Interface to those of Synthetic Surfactants

Onaizi

Nasser

Al-Lagtah

2016

J Surfact & Detergents

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The adsorption of surfactin, a lipopeptide biosurfactant, at the liquid–air interface has been investigated in this work. The maximum adsorption density and the nature and the extent of lateral interaction between the adsorbed surfactin molecules at the interface were estimated from surface tension data using the Frumkin model. The quantitative information obtained using the Frumkin model was also compared to those obtained using the Gibbs equation and the Langmuir–Szyszkowski model. Error analysis showed a better agreement between the experimental and the calculated values using the Frumkin model relative to the other two models. The adsorption of surfactin at the liquid–air interface was also compared to those of synthetic anionic, sodium dodecylbenzenesulphonate (SDBS), and nonionic, octaethylene glycol monotetradecyl ether (C14E8), surfactants. It has been estimated that the area occupied by a surfactin molecule at the interface is about 3- and 2.5-fold higher than those occupied by SDBS and C14E8 molecules, respectively. The interaction between the adsorbed molecules of the anionic biosurfactant (surfactin) was estimated to be attractive, unlike the mild repulsive interaction between the adsorbed SDBS molecules.

show abstract

The construction, fouling and enzymatic cleaning of a textile dye surface

Cited by 34 publications

References 61 publications

Plasma Treatment in Textile Industry

Plasma Treatment in Textile Industry

Comparison of positional surfactant isomers for displacement of rubisco protein from the air–water interface

Benchmarking the Self‐Assembly of Surfactin Biosurfactant at the Liquid–Air Interface to those of Synthetic Surfactants

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About