2011
DOI: 10.1037/a0022764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced response inhibition during intensive meditation training predicts improvements in self-reported adaptive socioemotional functioning.

Abstract: We examined the impact of training-induced improvements in self-regulation, operationalized in terms of response inhibition, on longitudinal changes in self-reported adaptive socioemotional functioning. Data were collected from participants undergoing 3 months of intensive meditation training in an isolated retreat setting (Retreat 1) and a wait-list control group that later underwent identical training (Retreat 2). A 32-min response inhibition task (RIT) was designed to assess sustained self-regulatory contro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
147
2
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
16
147
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The program taught in this study was a simplified version of a comprehensive meditation training program fully described in (Wallace, 2006). The latter program is regularly taught in the form of 3-month intensive retreats, as was the case in the Shamatha Project—a longitudinal study aimed at investigating a broad range of health-related outcomes and effects on basic physiology and brain function (MacLean et al, 2010; Jacobs et al, 2011; Sahdra et al, 2011; Saggar et al, 2012). It should be noted that, while the 3-month retreat program introduces elements of compassion training as well as Buddhist ethics, these components were not taught in the MAT program in this study to avoid possible confounds with the CBCT program described below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The program taught in this study was a simplified version of a comprehensive meditation training program fully described in (Wallace, 2006). The latter program is regularly taught in the form of 3-month intensive retreats, as was the case in the Shamatha Project—a longitudinal study aimed at investigating a broad range of health-related outcomes and effects on basic physiology and brain function (MacLean et al, 2010; Jacobs et al, 2011; Sahdra et al, 2011; Saggar et al, 2012). It should be noted that, while the 3-month retreat program introduces elements of compassion training as well as Buddhist ethics, these components were not taught in the MAT program in this study to avoid possible confounds with the CBCT program described below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This program has been used principally in the form of 3-month intensive retreats, as was the case in the Shamatha Project—a longitudinal study aimed at investigating a broad range of health-related outcomes and effects on basic physiology and brain function (MacLean et al, 2010; Jacobs et al, 2011; Sahdra et al, 2011; Saggar et al, 2012). The training includes two components of attention, which have been called focused attention (FA) and open monitoring (OM) (Lutz et al, 2008b), also known as concentrative attention and receptive attention, respectively (Brown, 1977; Valentine and Sweet, 1999; Jha et al, 2007; Austin, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Sahdra et al (2011) found an increased response inhibition after a 3-month retreat involving 6 to 10 h of daily meditation training. This response predicted adaptive socio-emotional functioning assessed through self-reported measures of anxiety, mindfulness, psychological well-being, and emotional regulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Other researchers have found increased response inhibition in the meditation group, compared with the waiting list, after 3 months of a meditation retreat, which consisted of 6-10 h of daily meditation training-including Shamatha and the Four Immeasurables (meditations on loving-kindness, compassion, equanimity, and empathetic joy). This response predicted adaptive socioemotional functioning assessed through self-report measures of anxiety, mindfulness, psychological well-being, and emotional regulation (Sahdra et al 2011). After the same retreat, the meditation group had increased emotional responses to suffering characterized by enhanced sympathetic concern for, and reduced aversion to, the suffering of others (Rosenberg et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%