2004
DOI: 10.1002/adma.200400627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Polymer Light‐Emitting Diode Performance Using a Crosslinked‐Network Electron‐Blocking Interlayer

Abstract: spontaneously filled by the action of capillary forces. The response of the molecular-sieve fibers to the applied electric field was observed by an optical microscope (Leitz Orthoplan) connected to a digital camera (Panasonic).Preparation of Oriented Thin Films: A cell was designed for the deposition experiment, as shown in Figure 2. The cell consisted of two copper plates, 25 mm long, held apart by a 2 mm non-conducting spacer. A 2 mm wide glass slide was placed between the electrodes. A dilute AlPO 4 -5 coll… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 summarizes typical results for our measured PLEDs, illustrating the enhancement seen in different parameters when switching to DC18. For the F8BT devices, the maximum brightness The overall brightness and efficiency of the reference devices, while not the highest reported, remain consistent with reported results using MEH PPV and F8BT in similar device structures, [34][35][36] providing evidence that they are a reproducible testing platform for novel injection layers. The brightness and turn on voltages are improved for both active layer polymers with the inclusion of DC18, but the F8BT devices see a larger efficiency improvement compared to the MEH PPV devices.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Table 1 summarizes typical results for our measured PLEDs, illustrating the enhancement seen in different parameters when switching to DC18. For the F8BT devices, the maximum brightness The overall brightness and efficiency of the reference devices, while not the highest reported, remain consistent with reported results using MEH PPV and F8BT in similar device structures, [34][35][36] providing evidence that they are a reproducible testing platform for novel injection layers. The brightness and turn on voltages are improved for both active layer polymers with the inclusion of DC18, but the F8BT devices see a larger efficiency improvement compared to the MEH PPV devices.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The CV curves showed that reversible oxidations occurred in both HSLs and the onset of oxidation potential for HSL1 and HSL2 are located at 0.85 and 1.08 V versus SCE, respectively. [ 48 ] The redox potential of Fc/ Fc + internal reference is 0.49 V versus SCE. The HOMO energy levels of HSL1 and HSL2, determined by calculating from the empirical formula of E HOMO = − e ( E ox + 4.8 − E 1/2, (Fc/Fc+) ), are −5.16 and −5.39 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Electrochemical Properties and Solvent Resistance Of Hslsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for polymer-based LEDs, where solution-based casting or spin-coating is the basic way to form films, it is very challenging to form multilayer structures, because of solvent erosion of previously deposited layers during spin-coating. [4] To overcome this problem, a crosslinkable HTL has been developed for fabricating highefficiency LEDs, such as those based on fluorescent conjugated polymers and red phosphorescent emitters. [5][6][7][8][9] For blue LEDs, because most of the blue phosphorescent emitters possess quite high energy levels at their highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) (for example, the HOMO for bis(4′,6′-difluorophenylpyridinato) tetrakis(1-pyrazolyl)-borate (FIr6) is -6.1 eV), it is quite difficult to obtain efficient hole injection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%