2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Pix2pix Dehazing Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
327
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 576 publications
(383 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
327
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a public benchmark for image dehazing and beyond, the sub-dataset SOTS [ 32 ] in RESIDE containing 500 indoor images and 500 outdoor images with different haze concentration was used for testing the performance of different dehazing algorithms. The quantitative results of our model and the extra seven state-of-the-art methods tested on SOTS are displayed in Table 4 and Table 5 , where the quantitative values of some methods were collected from [ 20 , 21 , 23 ]. From Table 4 , we can see that our model ranked the third among popular dehazing methods on the indoor images of SOTS, only second to the results by GridDN [ 23 ] and EPDN [ 20 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As a public benchmark for image dehazing and beyond, the sub-dataset SOTS [ 32 ] in RESIDE containing 500 indoor images and 500 outdoor images with different haze concentration was used for testing the performance of different dehazing algorithms. The quantitative results of our model and the extra seven state-of-the-art methods tested on SOTS are displayed in Table 4 and Table 5 , where the quantitative values of some methods were collected from [ 20 , 21 , 23 ]. From Table 4 , we can see that our model ranked the third among popular dehazing methods on the indoor images of SOTS, only second to the results by GridDN [ 23 ] and EPDN [ 20 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative results of our model and the extra seven state-of-the-art methods tested on SOTS are displayed in Table 4 and Table 5 , where the quantitative values of some methods were collected from [ 20 , 21 , 23 ]. From Table 4 , we can see that our model ranked the third among popular dehazing methods on the indoor images of SOTS, only second to the results by GridDN [ 23 ] and EPDN [ 20 ]. Meanwhile, our model ranked the second on outdoor images of SOTS as shown in Table 5 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Zhang et al also addressed the end-to-end dehazing problem under a deep learning based densely connected pyramid dehazing network [ 34 ]. Approaches using generative adversarial networks have also been studied in recent years [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ] Although these methods are capable of recovering satisfying results in daytime, their performances on nighttime dehazing are quite limited. In addition, learning based methods, especially the data-driven deep learning based approaches rely on the sufficient training data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%