2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.10.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced optical properties of InGaN MQWs with InGaN underlying layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in room temperature, luminescence efficiency is governed by non-radiative recombination process related to point defects in a QW [3,4]. By compared between samples with different QW thicknesses, the radiative lifetimes are decreasing as QW thickness increasing, which is explained by the reduction of electronhole wavefunction overlap in the tilted potential induced by piezo-electric field rather than the increase of non-radiative recombination centers in the highly localized potential.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, in room temperature, luminescence efficiency is governed by non-radiative recombination process related to point defects in a QW [3,4]. By compared between samples with different QW thicknesses, the radiative lifetimes are decreasing as QW thickness increasing, which is explained by the reduction of electronhole wavefunction overlap in the tilted potential induced by piezo-electric field rather than the increase of non-radiative recombination centers in the highly localized potential.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Inclusion of an In 0.02-Ga 0.98 N UL is representative of InGaN ULs employed in InGaN/GaN MQWs for improved IQE. 11 Two InGaN heterostructures were grown on pGaN:Mg templates under conditions nominally identical to MQWs. The first DLOS heterostructure (sample A) consisted of a 12.5-nm-thick In 0.17-Ga 0.83 N cap layer, which represents the optically active well layer of a MQW structure, grown on top of a $200-nm-thick UID In 0.02 Ga 0.98 N UL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors impacting IQE of MQW include the crystal quality of the MQW, the spatial distribution of the In content [1], and the quantum confine Stark effect (QCSE) [2]. There have been some articles reporting the increase of the IQE of MQW by using an InGaN underneath layer (UL) [3][4][5]. They mainly attributed the increase of the IQE to the decrease of the nonradiative centers (NRCs) due to a more uniform In distribution in MQW.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%