2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced nonlinear optical and optical limiting properties of graphene/ZnO hybrid organic glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[379] Hybrid composites with graphene and ZnO or CdS nanoparticles dispersed in PMMA glasses were proposed by Chen and coworkers. [380,381] They showed that the interfacial charge transfer between ZnO and graphene induced enhanced nonlinear absorption and nonlinear scattering properties. Graphene based hybrid materials appear clearly as extremely promising composites for THG applications both in nanosecond and picosecond regimes.…”
Section: Q13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[379] Hybrid composites with graphene and ZnO or CdS nanoparticles dispersed in PMMA glasses were proposed by Chen and coworkers. [380,381] They showed that the interfacial charge transfer between ZnO and graphene induced enhanced nonlinear absorption and nonlinear scattering properties. Graphene based hybrid materials appear clearly as extremely promising composites for THG applications both in nanosecond and picosecond regimes.…”
Section: Q13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The depth of these valleys increases as the loading concentration increases due to the stronger nonlinear absorption by more functional materials [40]. Besides, the lowest transmittance of Ormosil glasses at 532 nm is less than that at 1064 nm in the same loading concentration, using the same input energy density.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…One part of the light only including the transmitted light was detected by a detector (D1) since an aperture was used to block the scattered light, and the other part including amounts of scattered light was collected by lens and detected by another detector (D2). The detailed optical scheme was similar with that described in the reference [23,24]. In this case, D1 recorded the transmittance changes caused by NLS and NLA, while D2 recorded the transmittance changes mainly induced by NLA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%