Enhanced microfracture using acellular scaffolds improves results after treatment of symptomatic focal grade III/IV knee cartilage lesions but current clinical evidence does not allow unequivocal recommendation

Abstract

Purpose To systematically analyse post-operative outcomes following enhanced microfracture procedures in focal cartilage injuries of the knee. Methods Database searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases up to 30 November 2018, for clinical studies in humans that assessed surgical outcomes of enhanced microfracture procedures in focal cartilage injuries of the knee. The clinical, functional and imaging outcomes were assessed and summarized. The MINORS scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies included. Results Ten studies were included comprising a total of 331 patients (mean age of 37.0 ± 5.5 years, body mass 25.2 ± 1.7 kg m 2 , 56% male and 42% left knee), 278 femoral condyle chondral defects (147 medial, 35 lateral and 78 undefined) and 43 chondral defects distributed by the tibial plateau, patella and femoral trochlea. The chondral defects were mostly Outerbridge grade III or IV and the mean defect size was 3.2 ± 0.6 cm 2 . Studies consistently demonstrated significant improvement in the patient-reported outcome measures from baseline to final follow-up. Overall, imaging outcomes showed inconsistent results. Treatment-related adverse events were poorly reported. Conclusion Enhanced microfracture techniques significantly result in improved patient-reported outcome measures over the MCID, but provide inconsistent imaging results. Current clinical evidence does not allow for unequivocal recommendation of enhanced microfracture to treat symptomatic focal grade III/IV knee cartilage lesions. Level of evidence IV.

Clinical Outcomes of an All-Arthroscopic Technique for Single-Stage Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis in the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Lesions of the Knee

“…Patients were assessed preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and 2 years postoperatively using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, a validated questionnaire that assesses patients on 3 domains, symptoms, sports activity, and knee function, to provide an overall knee function score. 16 , 17 Patients were also assessed for postoperative complications, defined as skin or knee infections, skin dehiscence, iatrogenic fracture, hemarthrosis, or persistent pain postoperatively. All pre- and postoperative clinical outcome evaluations were performed by trained physiotherapists at our orthopaedic diagnostic center, an independent unit that tracks clinical outcomes and postoperative functional assessments for our department’s patients.…”

Comparison of All Arthroscopic Implantation of Chitosan-Based Liquid Scaffold and Hyaluronan-Based Soft Scaffold in the Treatment of Condylar Osteochondral Lesions in the Knee

“…21 A recent review revealed that the addition of a scaffold to microfracture treatment of a knee intra-articular cartilage lesion increased the treatment success. 28 The results of our study demonstrate that the biochemical or physical (gel or cover) properties of the material used do not impact on the results. Moreover, the two methods seem to be no different in terms of availability or ease of application.…”

Is Microfracture Alone Enough?

“…They also noticed that CBS treatment was associated with knee pain in 11% of subjects. Overall, MFX + techniques improved patient-reported outcomes over MCID, but offered inconsistent imaging results [42].…”