2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0024-3205(02)01684-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced inhibitory avoidance training protects against the amnesic effect of p–chloroamphetamine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible, therefore, that the higher number of footshocks used in the present study could enhance the association strength between the contextual CS and the US. Previous studies have shown that the intensity of the aversive stimulus during training can interfere with the amnesic effect of drugs on consolidation (Cruz-Morales, Duran-Arevalo, Diaz Del Guante, Quirarte, & Prado-Alcala, 1992; Solana-Figueroa, Salado-Castillo, Quirarte, Galindo, & Prado-Alcala, 2002). Independent of such possibilities, the results obtained in this study with icv administrations show that N/OFQ, at the same dose range that impairs acquisition, does not interfere with the consolidation of CFC and TFC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible, therefore, that the higher number of footshocks used in the present study could enhance the association strength between the contextual CS and the US. Previous studies have shown that the intensity of the aversive stimulus during training can interfere with the amnesic effect of drugs on consolidation (Cruz-Morales, Duran-Arevalo, Diaz Del Guante, Quirarte, & Prado-Alcala, 1992; Solana-Figueroa, Salado-Castillo, Quirarte, Galindo, & Prado-Alcala, 2002). Independent of such possibilities, the results obtained in this study with icv administrations show that N/OFQ, at the same dose range that impairs acquisition, does not interfere with the consolidation of CFC and TFC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although amnestic influences have been rarely studied in experiments using intensive training, the available findings have consistently indicated that amnestic treatments become ineffective or less effective when animals are extensively trained or given relatively high intensities of foot‐shock for training (Prado‐Alcalá et al, ). This effect has been observed after systemic administration of amnestic treatments (Durán‐Arévalo et al, ; Cruz‐Morales et al, ; Solana‐Figueroa et al, ; Díaz‐Trujillo et al, ) as well as localized treatments affecting the striatum (STR), amygdala (AMY), substantia nigra (SN), and hippocampus, among other cerebral structures (Thatcher and Kimble, ; Prado‐Alcalá and Cobos‐Zapiaín, , ; Prado‐Alcalá et al, ; Parent et al, , ; Cobos‐Zapiaín et al, ; Lazaro‐Muñoz et al, ). Such findings have been interpreted as suggesting that the affected structures are not critical sites for the changes mediating associations based on overtraining or strong aversive stimulation, which engages other brain regions subserving memory processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In spite of the abundant literature regarding the effects of systemic administration of serotonergic drugs on memory (e.g., Altman and Normile, 1987;Archer, 1982;Meneses, 1999Meneses, , 2002Misane et al, 1998;Ö gren, 1982, 1986aSolana-Figueroa et al, 1999, 2002b, there is a conspicuous scarcity of reports regarding the cognitive effects of their central administration. It is reasonable to postulate that serotonin (5-HT) must interact with other neurotransmitters in those cerebral regions known to participate in cognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%