2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000195932.48288.97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Glaucoma Staging System (GSS 2) for Classifying Functional Damage in Glaucoma

Abstract: The GSS 2 was able to correctly classify both damage severity and perimetric defect type in the sample studied, using either the corrected or uncorrected visual field indices. It is a quick and easy method, and its formulas can be introduced in any software.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
151
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
151
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, in our study, we correlated the reduction of the N1-P1 mfERG amplitudes and the increase of P1 IT detected in the two more central rings (R1-R2) with the generally used perimetric indices of glaucomatous damage (HFA MD and CPSD), 63 exclusively to assess whether the dysfunction observed in the macular area could be related to the grade of severity of OAG disease. We found a significant correlation between HFA MD and CPSD parameters and the N1-P1 mfERG RADs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, in our study, we correlated the reduction of the N1-P1 mfERG amplitudes and the increase of P1 IT detected in the two more central rings (R1-R2) with the generally used perimetric indices of glaucomatous damage (HFA MD and CPSD), 63 exclusively to assess whether the dysfunction observed in the macular area could be related to the grade of severity of OAG disease. We found a significant correlation between HFA MD and CPSD parameters and the N1-P1 mfERG RADs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abnormal SAP results were considered to be a reproducible glaucomatous VF loss in the absence of any other abnormalities to explain the defect. Mean VF defects were classified with Glaucoma Staging System (GSS) 12 within stage 4. The pre-operative and 3-months and 6-months post-operative mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD) indexes were used for the analysis.…”
Section: Study Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the averages of the two groups proved significant in checks made at 10.30 am, 3 pm and 5 pm. At the time of the first medical examination, the study of the visual field highlights impairment of the GSS2 [9], statistically more significant (p=0.001), in type A subjects (2.58±0.52) compared to those of type B (1.61±0.64).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%