“…The BET surface area of MMT is ~30 m 2 /g as reported in the literature (Barbier et al, 2000;Levy et al, 2019) while the BET of the PDADMAC-MMT (no significant difference between the powder and granules) was lower, 14-15 m 2 /g. The reduction in BET surface area was attributed to high polymer adsorption on the MMT Prostprint of: Water Research 115920 (2020) In Press DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115920 surface (Levy et al, 2019), since the BET surface area measurements, analyze the adsorption of nitrogen (N 2 ), which has little interaction with the polymers and high interactions with the clay surface (Carrado, 2000;Mayer, 1999). Despite the difference at the macro-scale, between the PDADMAC-MMT powder (0.04-0.14 mm) and the granules (1-2 mm), no significant changes were observed at the micro-scale, as observed from the SEM images (Figure 1C).…”