2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00075-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
730
6
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,215 publications
(769 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
27
730
6
6
Order By: Relevance
“…All the results above demonstrated that the RN-HA coating material had less negative influence on WJCs' osteoblastic differentiation, and somewhat enhanced WJCs' osteoblastic differentiation. Compared to FM-HA, RN-HA was proved to enhance the osteoblastic differentiation of WJCs, the synthesis of intracellular proteins, the alkaline phosphatase activity and the deposition of calcium-containing mineral, thus enhancing the bonding of orthopedic/dental implants to juxtaposed bone and improving the overall implant efficacy [25,26]. Finally, at the molecular level, OPN, OCN and Runx2 were demonstrated to be expressed during the later extracellular-matrix mineralization [27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the results above demonstrated that the RN-HA coating material had less negative influence on WJCs' osteoblastic differentiation, and somewhat enhanced WJCs' osteoblastic differentiation. Compared to FM-HA, RN-HA was proved to enhance the osteoblastic differentiation of WJCs, the synthesis of intracellular proteins, the alkaline phosphatase activity and the deposition of calcium-containing mineral, thus enhancing the bonding of orthopedic/dental implants to juxtaposed bone and improving the overall implant efficacy [25,26]. Finally, at the molecular level, OPN, OCN and Runx2 were demonstrated to be expressed during the later extracellular-matrix mineralization [27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to point out that Webster et al (Ref 7,14,15) observed higher osteoblast proliferation levels on nanostructured ceramics (including TiO 2 ) when compared to those of conventional ceramics. This higher osteoblast proliferation on nanostructured ceramics was attributed to the higher probability of protein adsorption caused by nano and submicron asperities on the nanomaterialsÕ surfaces.…”
Section: Enhanced Biocompatibility Of Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It should be noted that nanophase ceramics and their composites promoted and supported cell adhesion (and subsequent cell functions such as proliferation [2]) that were previously observed only on material surfaces modified through laborious and lengthy processes that involved immobilization of specially-designed, bioactive, synthetic adhesive peptides [5][6][7]. In contrast, preparation of the nanophase ceramics and their composites was easy, straight-forward and, in terms of time, short (on the order of a few hours).…”
Section: Cell Adhesionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The first, statistically-significant evidence of enhanced adhesion of rat calvaria osteoblasts on flat, nanophase (versus microphase/conventional) ceramics (alumina, titania and hydroxylapatite) as a function of decreasing ceramic grain size was provided only a few years ago [1][2]. Most importantly, the enhanced adhesion was specific to osteoblasts, but neither to fibroblasts nor to endothelial cells [3].…”
Section: Cell Adhesionmentioning
confidence: 99%