2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced electrochemical performances of silicon nanotube bundles anode coated with graphene layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The branched Si anode retained capacity of 654 mAh g −1 even at a high rate of 2 C, which was improved compared with other 1D nano-sized Si anodes. [34][35][36] The improvement indicated more efficient electron and Li ion transport in the branches with interconnected and interspaced secondary dendrites. However, the low intrinsic conductivity of Si caused rapid capacity fading down to 125 mAh g −1 at 3 C. The branched Si@C anode with conductive carbon layer exhibited enhanced capacities of 1055 mAh g −1 at 2 C and 813 mAh g −1 at 3 C, respectively.…”
Section: Electrochemical Performance Of the Branched Si And Si@c Anodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The branched Si anode retained capacity of 654 mAh g −1 even at a high rate of 2 C, which was improved compared with other 1D nano-sized Si anodes. [34][35][36] The improvement indicated more efficient electron and Li ion transport in the branches with interconnected and interspaced secondary dendrites. However, the low intrinsic conductivity of Si caused rapid capacity fading down to 125 mAh g −1 at 3 C. The branched Si@C anode with conductive carbon layer exhibited enhanced capacities of 1055 mAh g −1 at 2 C and 813 mAh g −1 at 3 C, respectively.…”
Section: Electrochemical Performance Of the Branched Si And Si@c Anodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[46] Table S1, Supporting Information, compares the electrochemical performance of our branched Si and Si@C anodes with other nano-sized Si anodes (1D nanostructures, nanoparticles etc.). [6,[34][35][36][47][48][49][50][51][52] Both the branched Si and Si@C anodes showed improved capacity, rate performance, and cycling stability, demonstrating the advantages of the branched nanostructures.…”
Section: Electrochemical Performance Of the Branched Si And Si@c Anodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the thickness and number of layers of Graphene cannot be identified due to the limitation of SEM imaging. For example, a crumple surface of graphene sheet was visualized by SEM [89,94]. It was speculated that the winkled surface morphology indicated a relatively high surface area of graphene and contributed to the increase in electron conductivity, which resulted in an improved electrochemical performance [70,95].…”
Section: Graphene Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The atomic force microscope (AFM) was utilized to measure the thickness of graphene nanosheets. Many of the fabricated Si/Graphene nanocomposites had graphene thickness of less than 10 nm [23,83,94]. However, AFM was not able to tell if the graphene was single layer due to molecules absorbed on the graphene surface.…”
Section: Graphene Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a lot of reports on Si achieving a practical capacity of up to 3000 mAh/g, but Si-based anodes are yet to be commercialized since cycle life and performance in full cells are poor. For instance, most reports show that very high-capacity values were obtained when using a high amount of inactive materials (binder and conductive additive can reach up to 50% of total electrode weight) and low electrode loading (<1 mg/cm 2 ), which cannot be adopted by industry. The other major problem is poor reproducibility caused by using the “in-house”-made silicon with various morphologies (e.g., silicon nanowires, , silicon nanoparticles, porous silicon, , silicon nanosheets, silicon nanotubes, just to name a few) or commercial silicon available in low-batches only . However, it is obvious that only cheap commercial silicon with reproducible properties could be of interest to the battery industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%