1975
DOI: 10.1163/9789004486621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

English Translation Theory 1650-1800

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most commonly applied theoretical concept mentioned in studies was the recovery model (mentioned in four studies) (Anthony, ). Two concepts were philosophical rather than theoretical and did not offer a mechanistic explanation for how care farming might contribute to well‐being; namely, “existential issues” and “anthroposophy” (O'Connor & Chamberlain, ; Steiner, ). These were excluded from the process of developing a theoretical framework.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly applied theoretical concept mentioned in studies was the recovery model (mentioned in four studies) (Anthony, ). Two concepts were philosophical rather than theoretical and did not offer a mechanistic explanation for how care farming might contribute to well‐being; namely, “existential issues” and “anthroposophy” (O'Connor & Chamberlain, ; Steiner, ). These were excluded from the process of developing a theoretical framework.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early work in general translation history dates back to Edmond Cary's history of 'great French translators' (Cary 1963). Works of a general nature followed this publication throughout the 1970s and 1980s and a brief list includes works by Steiner (1975), Kelly (1979), Berman (1984), Ballard (1992), Vermeer (1992), Robinson (1997). Since the 1980s a number of developments have enabled an increased focus on the history of the practice of translation, rather than translation theory.…”
Section: Key Areas In Focus In Translation Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the difference lies in the use of plant and mineral preparations as additives to compost and soil sprays-"biodynamic preparations"-and in following a planting schedule for cultivation, sowing and harvesting based on cosmic forces and rhythms and, particularly, on Moon rhythm (Table 3) [41,42]. This variant of organic agriculture, initiated in a series of lectures given by Rudolf Steiner [43] in 1924, is considered by some authors as an alternative approach to modern agriculture (see review in Brock et al [44]), while others consider it as not being a science-based practice (see review in Chalker-Scott [41]). The latter brands it as a scam of great implantation in countries as advanced as Germany where it has its origin and from where Brussels is pressured to accept its principles.…”
Section: Biodynamic Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%