2018
DOI: 10.21710/rch.v20i0.340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

English, Russian and Russian English in Russia: CLIL and non-CLIL students’ opinion in St. Petersburg

Abstract: English is a Lingua Franca in the many domains. Its spread is a factor and a result of the Expanding Globalization. The current conflict between Russia and the West initiates a number of increasing concerns towards the fate and the future of the Russian language.To be more exact, they are underdevelopment, pidginization and influx and spread of the English language uncontrolled. The research was carried out at Saint Petersburg University in the period of January 2016. CLIL and non-CLIL students from three Sain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained data enabled to understand Science teachers' practices in terms of using the CLIL approach in Kazakhstani secondary schools during COVID-19 pandemic that reflected overall positive perceptions of CLIL in a remote learning setting. This contradicted the results of research conducted in Russian universities, where teaching school subjects in English have not met clear support, and it was offered to reduce the amount of English discourse (Pavenkova et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The obtained data enabled to understand Science teachers' practices in terms of using the CLIL approach in Kazakhstani secondary schools during COVID-19 pandemic that reflected overall positive perceptions of CLIL in a remote learning setting. This contradicted the results of research conducted in Russian universities, where teaching school subjects in English have not met clear support, and it was offered to reduce the amount of English discourse (Pavenkova et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%