English Medium Instruction at Crossroads: Students’ Voice and Way Forward

Abstract

Globalisation and extensive use of technology have enhanced the status of English as an international language and increased its value as an important commodity in various fields. This has encouraged the use of English in the teaching of content subjects especially those related to science and technology in many countries across Asia. This paper starts with an overview of English medium instruction policy in the region with an emphasis on the ongoing debate regarding the teaching and learning of Science and Mathematics in English in Malaysia. Drawing on data from a longitudinal study which utilized questionnaires and the paper presents empirical evidence on the learners' views and experience in learning Science in English, as well as their performance in the standardized national examination. The data gathered from a total of 1000 students from urban and rural schools in Sarawak, Malaysia, indicate the they have rather positive view about their ability in English, had positive experience in learning Science in English. Their positive view and experience conform to their performance in the subject. The results also correlate with the majority of the students' language preference for learning Science which is English and bilingual instruction in English and Bahasa Malaysia. The paper ends with a discussion on possible amicable options for medium instruction issues in ESL/EFL contexts.

Perspectives of business stakeholders about EMI in Turkiye

“…Despite the lack of previous research on business stakeholders' perspectives, there are other stakeholders, such as students who hold the belief that studying their subjects in English would benefit them most in their future careers (Rethinasamy et al, 2021) because "companies are moving towards English" (Al-Issa, 2017, p. 9). Similarly, many Turkish students chose English-taught programmes due to "the increased chances of finding jobs after graduation" (Oz, 2005, p. 341).…”

Malaysian ESL Teachers’ Language Assessment Literacy Issues in Implementing CEFR-Aligned Classroom-Based Assessment: How to Deal with Them?

“…Published Online: 17 April 2024 the Primary School Achievement Test or so-called Ujian Penilaian Sekolah Rendah (UPSR) and Form 3 Assessment or so called Pentaksiran Tingkatan 3 (PT3) were abolished (Rethinasamy et al, 2021) due to the ineffectiveness of both to measure students ' learning ability (Marzaini et al, 2023). Since the abolition, the Ministry of Education (MoE) has introduced Classroom-Based Assessment (CBA) as a step towards a more progressive and continuous assessment system (MoE, 2019).…”

Evaluating Teachers’ Assessment Literacy in Enacting Cefr-Aligned Classroom-Based Assessment in Malaysian Secondary Schools ESL Classroom

“…Therefore, many efforts have been done by the government to revamp the current education by relooking the assessment system in the country. Starting in 2021, the government began a reform plan which saw the end of summative high-stake examinations like UPSR and PT3 (Rethinasamy et al, 2021) in the Malaysian education system. Replacing these high-stake examinations, the government has introduced the Classroom-Based Assessment (CBA) as a way of uprooting education toward a more progressive and continuous assessment system (MOE,2019).…”