2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22464-0_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

English Education Policy in Thailand: Why the Poor Results?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This happens as English is the international language that must be learned by all learners in Thailand. According to Kaur, Young, & Kirkpatrick (2016) English is taught as a compulsory subject across the nation. International conferences, tourism, and global advertising are the domains in which English is spoken.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This happens as English is the international language that must be learned by all learners in Thailand. According to Kaur, Young, & Kirkpatrick (2016) English is taught as a compulsory subject across the nation. International conferences, tourism, and global advertising are the domains in which English is spoken.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been an attempt to elevate the quality of English language education in Thailand for over a decade (Baker & Jarunthawatchai, 2017;Kaur, Young, & Kirkpatrick, 2016). However, as reported by the Education First English Language Proficiency Index (EF EPI) in 2016, from 80 countries around the world, Thailand ranked 53th, labelled "Low Proficiency".…”
Section: Elt Situation At Tertiary Level In Thailandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaur et al (2016) assert the development of language proficiency among Thais are still problematic, despite numerous of initiatives related to English Language Teaching (ELT) and language proficiency development such as the promotion of English program, Bilingual program, mini English program and the integration of Common European Framework of References for Languages (CEFR) in the assessment and classroom management system across educational level (Office of The Basic Education Commision, 2014). Most of the initiatives failed to meet their goals (Kaur et al, 2016;Todd, 2015). As pointed out by Chayunuvat (2017) on the nature of Thai learners, Thai students are unable to use English language to serve their own needs.…”
Section: Elt Situation At Tertiary Level In Thailandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cuesta and Madrigal (2014) reported a proportionately larger spending by Thai families on private education. These private schools normally offer international English curricula from countries such as Singapore, the United Kingdom (UK), or the United States of America (USA), and are accredited by the Ministry of Education, or by external bodies such as the Western Association of School and Colleges (WASC) and the Council of International Schools (CIS) (Kaur, Young, & Kirkpatrick, 2016). There are two major types of private schools: full-fledged international schools where the medium of instruction and administration is English, with the exception of foreign language subjects, which includes Thai, and bilingual schools which have an English Program (EP) and an English Intensive Program (EIP).…”
Section: Research Context and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%