1996
DOI: 10.17226/4919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering Within Ecological Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Throughout the world, feral horses (Equus caballus) are causing environmental degradation and a decline in ecological integrity; defined in terms of the characteristic structure, composition and function of an ecosystem compared to the range of natural or historic conditions and disturbance regimes (Karr, 1996;Lindenmayer & Franklin, 2002;Parrish et al, 2003). Of particular concern is the extent to which feral horses degrade vegetation condition and associated ecosystem processes, which is a well-recognised conservation threat (Rogers, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout the world, feral horses (Equus caballus) are causing environmental degradation and a decline in ecological integrity; defined in terms of the characteristic structure, composition and function of an ecosystem compared to the range of natural or historic conditions and disturbance regimes (Karr, 1996;Lindenmayer & Franklin, 2002;Parrish et al, 2003). Of particular concern is the extent to which feral horses degrade vegetation condition and associated ecosystem processes, which is a well-recognised conservation threat (Rogers, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Holling (1996) described the central concept of ecological resilience as the capacity to maintain the existence of jsd.ccsenet.org…”
Section: Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, resilience can be thought of as how far the system is from certain thresholds or boundaries beyond which the system will undergo a regime shift or a quantitative change in system structure or identity. Holling (1996) categorized resilience into two types, engineering resilience, which refers to the ability of a system to return to steady state following a perturbation, and ecological resilience, which refers to the capacity of system to remain in particular stability domain in the face of perturbations. The latter category is used by many 10 researchers to discuss resilience of social ecological systems (or more generally CISs) (Gunderson et al, 1995;Berkes and Folke, 1998;Carpenter et al, 1999aCarpenter et al, , 1999bScheffer et al, 2000;Anderies et al, 2002;Gunderson and Holling, 2002;Berkes et al, 2003;Walker et al, 2004;Carpenter and Brock, 2004;Janssen et al, 2004;Anderies, 2005;Folke et al, 2002;Anderies et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%