The Application of Composite Indicators to Disaster Resilience: A Case Study in Osaka Prefecture, Japan

Abstract

This paper presents an empirical verification of the measurement of baseline characteristics for fostering regional resilience. A set of indicators was selected from previous studies of disaster resilience, and an environmental element was added. The aims of the study were (1) to select a set of indicators that could be used for measuring disaster resilience, based on a review of the research literature, (2) to evaluate these indicators using the statistical approach of standardization, and to visualize the results using Geographic Information System (GIS) technology, and (3) to identify the key resilience characteristics using principal component analysis (PCA). The study focused on 29 municipalities in Osaka Prefecture, Japan. From the literature review, a total of 17 disaster resilience indicators were selected, covering economic, social, and community connection factors. The novel environmental attributes were selected from the literature on environmental sustainability. The standardized measures demonstrated that municipalities with a high level of resilience were also ranked highly on both the "social" and "community connection" attributes. The GIS mapping resulted a prominent urban-suburban divide, with urban areas having a lower level of resilience than suburban areas. The PCA demonstrated significant variation across the 29 municipalities, characterized by the factors "living standard" and "regional involvement." An understanding of these baseline characteristics would allow governments to monitor chronological changes in the resilience of specific regions. This information can be used to support the establishment of an evaluation platform, and can contribute to a more systematic management of resilience.

Constructing Earthquake Disaster-Exposure Likelihood Index Using Shapley-Value Regression Approach

“…(3) Standardization of the indicator value Standardization of data needs to be done to equalize the measurement scale of data coming from various sources. When there are variables measured on different scales, the variables need to be standardized, prior to the sum or aggregation of the data (Ebisudani and Tokai, 2017). The proposed technique is range-equalization where each indicator ( ) will be transformed into intervals 0 to 1.…”

A Factor Analysis Approach Toward Reconciling Community Vulnerability and Resilience Indices for Natural Hazards

“…For example, Renschler et al (2010) proposed seven categories of capital systems for measuring resilience: people, environment, government, infrastructure, lifestyle, economic, and social, while Sherrieb et al (2010) suggested four systems: economic, social, communication, and competence. There are a multitude of variations, differing in numbers and names of capital systems (Cohen, Leykin, Lahad, Goldberg, & Aharonson-Daniel, 2013;Cutter, 2016;Ebisudani & Tokai, 2017;Joerin & Shaw, 2011;Norris et al, 2008;Orencio & Fujii, 2013;Perfrement & Lloyd, 2015;Pendall et al, 2010;Shaw et al, 2010;Tapia et al, 2017;THRIVE, 2004;Yoon, Kang, & Brody, 2016).…”

“…(2010) suggested four systems: economic, social, communication, and competence. There are a multitude of variations, differing in numbers and names of capital systems (Cohen, Leykin, Lahad, Goldberg, & Aharonson‐Daniel, 2013; Cutter, 2016; Ebisudani & Tokai, 2017; Joerin & Shaw, 2011; Norris et al., 2008; Orencio & Fujii, 2013; Perfrement & Lloyd, 2015; Pendall et al., 2010; Shaw et al., 2010; Tapia et al., 2017; THRIVE, 2004; Yoon, Kang, & Brody, 2016).…”