2018
DOI: 10.3390/su10010142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering Properties of Self-Consolidating Lightweight Aggregate Concrete and Its Application in Prestressed Concrete Members

Abstract: Self-consolidating lightweight aggregate concrete (SCLC) is a highly flowable and lightweight concrete. In this study, the properties of SCLC and prestressed SCLC members were tested and compared with those made of normal-weight self-consolidating concrete (SCC). The test results show that SCLC can be used for prestressed concrete members. The use of lightweight aggregates with a particle density larger than 1100 kg/m 3 can avoid the serious segregation of fresh concrete. In addition, the SCLC designed in this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
10
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lightweight aggregate concrete (LWAC), a material widely used due to its many advantages, such as its low density, good thermal insulation, and fire resistance, has been extensively studied as both structural and non-structural material [1]. The use of LWACs allows greater design flexibility, considerable reductions of the dead loads, and substantial cost savings [2,3,4], and leads to improvements in the seismic resistance capacity of the structures [5]. As reported by Pla et al [6], the use of LWAC does not establish significant differences in the fluid transport properties of lightweight concretes and when they are exposed to high temperature fluctuations, such as building fires, Young’s modulus of lightweight concretes decreases at a slower pace as the temperature increases than in conventional concretes [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lightweight aggregate concrete (LWAC), a material widely used due to its many advantages, such as its low density, good thermal insulation, and fire resistance, has been extensively studied as both structural and non-structural material [1]. The use of LWACs allows greater design flexibility, considerable reductions of the dead loads, and substantial cost savings [2,3,4], and leads to improvements in the seismic resistance capacity of the structures [5]. As reported by Pla et al [6], the use of LWAC does not establish significant differences in the fluid transport properties of lightweight concretes and when they are exposed to high temperature fluctuations, such as building fires, Young’s modulus of lightweight concretes decreases at a slower pace as the temperature increases than in conventional concretes [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies around the world have been dedicated to research in the field of lightweight aggregate concrete. Consequently, various concrete mixtures with different mechanical properties have been proposed [5][6][7][8][9][10]. However, in most cases, traditional studies usually address the optimization of concrete properties with respect to one or more aspects, such as microstructure, mechanical resistance, and durability [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the obtained findings do not lead to the final expected effect [5]. The improvement of selected material properties is accompanied by changes in other important parameters [9]. Moreover, experimental results are usually achieved by testing on small-scale specimens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segregation is facilitated by higher values of gravitation forces, which are related to the volume of the aggregate and ∆ ρ value. The use of LWA with a particle density higher than 1100 kg/m 3 can avoid the serious segregation of fresh self-consolidating LWAC [55]. On the other side, higher values of drag force, which is influenced by the mortar viscosity and aggregate shape, reduce segregation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%