1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf02594975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering properties of ashfield shale, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of authors have discussed correlations between the petrographical and mechanical properties of common rocks such as granite, sandstone, limestone, shale, etc. (see, for example , Bell 1978;Sachpazis 1990;Ghafoori et al 1993;Ulusay et al 1994;Shakoor and Brown 1996;Topal and Doyuran 1997;Bell and Lindsay 1999;Tugrul and Zarif 1999). The present study reports data on core samples collected from 19 wells in the Krishna-Godavari (K-G) and Cauvery basins, both onshore and offshore.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A number of authors have discussed correlations between the petrographical and mechanical properties of common rocks such as granite, sandstone, limestone, shale, etc. (see, for example , Bell 1978;Sachpazis 1990;Ghafoori et al 1993;Ulusay et al 1994;Shakoor and Brown 1996;Topal and Doyuran 1997;Bell and Lindsay 1999;Tugrul and Zarif 1999). The present study reports data on core samples collected from 19 wells in the Krishna-Godavari (K-G) and Cauvery basins, both onshore and offshore.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The effect of water content on the strength of soft rocks and shales has been outlined by a number of researchers (Ghafoori et al, 1993;Greene and Schaffer, 1997;Lashkaripour, 2002). Accordingly, the test results of Edwards Limestone exhibit trends similar to those shown in Figure 5-6.…”
Section: Effect Of Water Content On Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The third method adopted in this study is averaging values based on water content because water content is generally known as a significant factor affecting the strength of shales (Ghafoori et al, 1993;Greene and Schaffer, 1997;Lashkaripour, 2002). The test results were re-arranged into six groups based on water content, and the averaged values were plotted in Figure 6-19.…”
Section: Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From all the UCS test samples, it can be said that the percentage decrease in Qu value at 30 minutes of drying is 23%, 60 minutes of drying is 41%, and 90 minutes of drying is 59%. This can be attributed to research conducted [9], that the compressive strength (Qu) of clay shale decreased by 55.02% during the first cycle of the drying wetting process. After going through the second cycle, the Qu value has decreased by 70.41%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%