Engineering practices as a framework for STEM education: a proposal based on epistemic nuances

Abstract

The role of engineering education has gained prominence within the context of STEM education. New educational perspectives such as the National Research Council’s Framework for K-12 Science Education consider engineering practices one of the central pillars of a sound STEM education. While this idea of developing a set of practices analogous to those of professional engineering resonates with recent views of STEM education research, current approaches such as the NRC’s Framework seem too dependent on and interlinked with the list for scientific practices and adheres to this list too strictly. This paper draws on the NRC’s Framework proposing a new set of engineering practices that seek to incorporate the epistemic nuances that differentiate engineering from science. The nine engineering practices proposed contain epistemological nuances that are missing in other proposals, including essential aspects such as problem scoping, identifying multiple solutions, selecting, testing and improving solutions and materializing solutions. This epistemic approach may facilitate students’ content learning and thinking development, offering a more comprehensive and realistic view of the STEM fields.

An Examination of the Studies on STEM in Education: A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis

“…Developed and developing countries have recently been seriously engaged in Science, Technology, Mathematics, and Engineering (STEM) education (Li et al, 2020;Simarro & Couso, 2021). Especially in the USA, STEM integration is being used increasingly (Nxumalo & Gitari, 2021).…”

A Framework for the Integration of Green and Sustainable Chemistry into the Undergraduate Curriculum: Greening Our Practice with Scientific and Engineering Practices

“…With these criteria in mind, students can more easily be prompted to systematically evaluate the acceptability of the proposed solutions, engineer their own solution to the problem, and balance trade-offs between competing perspectives and solutions to the problem at hand. 74 Although engineering practices are rarely incorporated into chemistry curricula in higher education, 75 we envision that they can act as the vehicle that drives the decision-making involved in real-world chemistry problems. By using engineering practices as part of the framework for instructional design, we can target specific performances that will elicit robust evidence of the desired learning performances.…”

“…As students define the chemical and environmental problem at hand, they are encouraged to think more deeply about why it is a problem and be able to define the criteria and constraints of interest to the groups of stakeholders impacted by the problem. With these criteria in mind, students can more easily be prompted to systematically evaluate the acceptability of the proposed solutions, engineer their own solution to the problem, and balance trade-offs between competing perspectives and solutions to the problem at hand . Although engineering practices are rarely incorporated into chemistry curricula in higher education, we envision that they can act as the vehicle that drives the decision-making involved in real-world chemistry problems.…”

STEM Education and Problem-Solving in Space Science: A Case Study with CanSat

“…STEM education is an interdisciplinary approach that arouses curiosity and interest in students because it promotes the learning of specific concepts in practical activities where students apply science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in contexts, establishing connections between school, community, and the world of work and businesses, thus enabling the development of literacy and STEM skills to compete in the new economy [3,4]. In this study, we adopted a holistic view with several dimensions [5].…”