Engineering of Creativity

Savransky, Semyon D.

doi:10.1201/9781420038958

Cited by 380 publications

(62 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The TRIZ methodology proposes different methods, tools and algorithms to help design during the evolution of technical systems. The matrix of contradictions is an example of tools useful to solves the contradictions (Savransky, 2000). Even though powerful, the TRIZ approach doesn't propose a framework to adapt the current design process to the evolving system.…”

Section: Systems Evolutionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Safety Requirements Evolution in the Transition of Land Transportation Systems Toward Autonomy

Damak¹,

Janković²,

Leroy³

et al. 2018

Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Autonomous Vehicles (AV) are the future evolution of Land Transportation Systems (LTS). They promise an improvement in road safety. However, safety requirements stay a big challenge for their development. The literature presents a lack of insight on the way LTS safety requirements will evolve. This paper proposes an analysis method of LTS safety requirements evolution toward AV. The ASIL metric is used to evaluate the safety criticality. The application on two case studies, the steering by wire and platooning systems, results in a better understanding and characterization of this evolution

show abstract

Section: Systems Evolutionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Safety Requirements Evolution in the Transition of Land Transportation Systems Toward Autonomy

Damak¹,

Janković²,

Leroy³

et al. 2018

Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, there is little evidence for their effectiveness ( [9]) -the results are judged as good because they are compared to results of boring corporate way of working. Altshuller [10] was even more skeptical noting that brainstorming -developed over the period of 12 years since 1977, with expense of 4 million dollars -is usually a team effort, so its effectiveness should be measured counting how many man-hours were spent [11].…”

Section: Creativitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1) basic enhancement -32% of analyzed patents are at this level: for example, after designing the diver suit, the next natural step was adding ability to change the size of the "shoe" by introducing the set of lead shoe toes of various size; 2) improvement -45% of patents improve an existing idea (within the same technology branch), for example adding middle layer of metal for welding, enhancing quality of connection; 3) major improvement -18% of patents lead to a radical change using solutions taken from other technology branches; 4) radical breakthrough -4% of patents go beyond current paradigm, for example changing electromechanic switch in favor of the semiconductor one; 5) discovery -only 1% of patents are based on new discoveries going beyond existing knowledge [11]. Discovery is very rare and is a privilege of a very few people.…”

Section: Creativitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Braingene: Computational creativity algorithm that invents novel interesting names

Pilichowski

Duch

2013

2013 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Human-Like Intelligence (CIHLI)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Human-level intelligence implies creativity, not only on the grand scale, but primarily in the everyday activity, such as understanding intentions, behavior, and invention of new words. Psychological models of creativity have some support in experimental cognitive psychology, but computational models of creative processes are quite rare. This paper presents a model of creative processes behind invention of novel words related to description of products and services.

show abstract

“…Reversing the action used to solve a problem would be one of the major inventive principles. 5 From the perspective of patent infringement, the reversing an action would avoid the "all-elements rule", 4 and could prevent the new design from falling within the scope of the claim. Example 1.…”

Section: O N O T D I S T R I B U T Ementioning

confidence: 99%

Design-around biotechnology patents: An analysis of US Federal Circuit decisions shows the possibility of designing around biotechnology patents

Wang¹

2011

Human Vaccines

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

I n order to demonstrate the possibility of design-around for patents, we reviewed 40 no-infringement cases out of all 4,760 Federal Circuit Court of Appeals (CAFC) cases decided from 2001 to 2009. Based on this analysis, designing around a biotechnology patent first requires a thorough reading of the patent specification and prosecution history. These written descriptions offer explicit directions about claim meanings or the scope being disclaimed. By statute, claims recite and define the structure or acts of an invention, and serve as tools to determine whether or not a patent is infringed. The next procedure would include omitting a part or property from the claim, reversing the action used in the claim or changing the claim's structure or range to prevent the new design from falling within the scope of the claim. However, cases where patent infringement was found demonstrated that changing the structure or range not recited in the claim, such as enlarging the diameter, reducing concentration or alerting the shape, still falls within the scope of the patent. Although the 40 cases analyzed in this study were not related to vaccines, the thought process can serve as a guideline for patents related to vaccine development.

show abstract

Engineering of Creativity

Cited by 380 publications

References 0 publications

Analysis of Safety Requirements Evolution in the Transition of Land Transportation Systems Toward Autonomy

Analysis of Safety Requirements Evolution in the Transition of Land Transportation Systems Toward Autonomy

Braingene: Computational creativity algorithm that invents novel interesting names

Design-around biotechnology patents: An analysis of US Federal Circuit decisions shows the possibility of designing around biotechnology patents

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About