2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering design earthquakes from multimodal hazard disaggregation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both systems are supposed located in Sulmona (close to L'Aquila, in central Italy). PSHA for this site (Figure 7, left) was carried out via the FORTRAN code also used in [19]. In the software, the seismogenic source zones of Italy are those of [20], while seismic parameters of each zone are those from [21,22].…”
Section: Seismic Hazard and Im Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both systems are supposed located in Sulmona (close to L'Aquila, in central Italy). PSHA for this site (Figure 7, left) was carried out via the FORTRAN code also used in [19]. In the software, the seismogenic source zones of Italy are those of [20], while seismic parameters of each zone are those from [21,22].…”
Section: Seismic Hazard and Im Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7 (left) shows the source zones considered, while Figure 7 (right) provides the resulting distribution of intensity at the site given the occurrence of an earthquake. Further details about PSHA for the site, and a summary of the source zone parameters, may be found in [19]. However, a relevant information for this study is that the rate of occurrence of earthquakes within the magnitude bounds of the considered seismic sources, and then at the site, is ν E = 1.95 [events/year].…”
Section: Seismic Hazard and Im Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…return periods, was disaggregated. This allowed to determine the design earthquakes for each T R and both IMs, using the same procedure as in Iervolino et al [15]. Table 1 reports the M and R bins and strong motion databases in which records were selected via the REXEL software [16].…”
Section: Seismic Hazard and Ground Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because when selecting a set of accelerograms for structural analysis the main objective is to reflect the relevant hazard scenarios at the site, for example from disaggregation (e.g., Iervolino et al 2011), REXELite allows to select suites which also belong to user-defined magnitude (M) and source-to-site distance (R) bins, and to the same site class of the location of the structure, or to any site class. ITACA may be searched for spectrum-matching sets of records which are original (unscaled) or ground motions linearly scaled in amplitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%