Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.1080/13639080.2011.573776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engagement in learning after errors at work: enabling conditions and types of engagement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
57
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the current research should be extended to the level of work teams for which reflective activities are a crucial means to foster team performance in general and team innovation in particular (Müller et al ., ; Rupprecht et al ., ; West, ). Finally, in future research, a closer look should be taken at critical incidents, such as errors or structural transformations in organizations, which trigger work‐related reflection and IWB (Bauer & Mulder, ; Leicher et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, the current research should be extended to the level of work teams for which reflective activities are a crucial means to foster team performance in general and team innovation in particular (Müller et al ., ; Rupprecht et al ., ; West, ). Finally, in future research, a closer look should be taken at critical incidents, such as errors or structural transformations in organizations, which trigger work‐related reflection and IWB (Bauer & Mulder, ; Leicher et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Errors can be defined as Ba deliberate action (or deliberate omission of actions) characterized by the unintended failure to achieve personal goals and/or the unintended deviation from organizational norms and goals which could have been avoided by alternative behaviors of the acting person^ (Putz et al 2012, p. 108). As a consequence, organizations wanting to benefit from learning from errors need to create an environment in which individuals can overcome the negative short-term connotations in order to engage in learning behavior after making an error (Bauer and Mulder 2013;Billett 2012;van Dyck et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning from errors requires a process of deriving new knowledge, new skills, and new methods from information provided by errors (Bauer and Mulder 2013;Billett 2012;Harteis et al 2007;Zhao 2011). The concept of learning from errors has received most attention in the business and management literature when addressing learning at the organizational level (for a review, see Frese and Keith 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We developed a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to validate our scale and showed that the four-item scale was unidimensional with high reliability (a = .92, AVE = .70). Scales that measure organizational learning based on the main participants have been widely used in recent studies (e.g., Bauer and Mulder 2013;Chang et al 2011;García-Morales et al 2006;Hsiao and Chang 2011;Rhee and Sigler 2010).…”
Section: Organizational Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%