2012
DOI: 10.3386/w18456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-Saving Technical Change

Abstract: We estimate an aggregate production function with constant elasticity of substitution between energy and a capital/labor composite using U.S. data. The implied measure of energysaving technical change appears to respond strongly to the oilprice shocks in the 1970s and has a negative medium-run correlation with capital/labor-saving technical change. Our findings are suggestive of a model of directed technical change, with low short-run substitutability between energy and capital/labor but significant substituta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
138
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
10
138
0
Order By: Relevance
“…proposed by Saunders (1992), Petith (2008), and Hassler et al (2012). Our model is also somewhat similar to Fröling's (2011) unified growth model.…”
Section: Model and Methodssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…proposed by Saunders (1992), Petith (2008), and Hassler et al (2012). Our model is also somewhat similar to Fröling's (2011) unified growth model.…”
Section: Model and Methodssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…For this reason, intermittent renewable electricity production relies on a buffer of conventional generation to balance the grid. In this setting, limited storage solutions imply that conventional electricity Hassler et al (2012).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such technologies arise when less fossil fuel energy inputs are used in favour of more capital in response to, say, a tax on the use of fossil fuel. However, empirical evidence suggests that there is limited substitutability between energy and capital and labour (Hassler et al 2012) in which case fossil fuel use is proportional to aggregate output. More specifically, fossil fuel use is given by γ 0 (1 − r γ ) t GDP t where the initial energy intensity γ 0 is calibrated at 0.15 GtC per trillion dollars of world GDP (cf.…”
Section: End Of Carbon Era and Peak Warmingmentioning
confidence: 99%