2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy performance of different silicon photovoltaic technologies under hot and harsh climate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Temperature losses can be an important factor of power losses in PV systems [27][28][29]. The temperature losses were calculated by using Eq.…”
Section: Performance Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature losses can be an important factor of power losses in PV systems [27][28][29]. The temperature losses were calculated by using Eq.…”
Section: Performance Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solar energy has the exclusive potential to generate electricity through Photovoltaic (PV) panels technology [24][25][26]. The capability of electricity generation from solar PV technology is versatile from milliwatt to gigawatt [27][28][29]. Additionally, solar PV technology can also be used with electric, hybrid and autonomous vehicles either directly integrating PV panel with these vehicles or indirectly through PV power station to recharge these vehicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that a polycrystalline module is the most performing one followed respectively by amor-phous module, Heterojunction Incorporating thin [2] film module and monocrystalline module. Elsewhere, A. Tossa et al [3] showed that a micromorph module is best performing, followed by a monocrystalline module and a polycrystalline module from the same manufacturer. The less performing is a polycrystalline module from another manufacturer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%