2020
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2020.3003235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Management Through Footstep Selection For Bipedal Robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compliant walking controllers enhance navigation in challenging terrains [86], bridging the gap between robots and authentic bipedal locomotion for enhanced stability and efficiency [87]. Features such as the six degree of freedom (DOF) parallel link mechanism improve leg inertia and position tracking at higher frequencies [42], [87]. Current research focuses on refining robotic locomotion across irregular terrains [43].…”
Section: Stability and Locomotion In Bipedal Wheel-legged Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compliant walking controllers enhance navigation in challenging terrains [86], bridging the gap between robots and authentic bipedal locomotion for enhanced stability and efficiency [87]. Features such as the six degree of freedom (DOF) parallel link mechanism improve leg inertia and position tracking at higher frequencies [42], [87]. Current research focuses on refining robotic locomotion across irregular terrains [43].…”
Section: Stability and Locomotion In Bipedal Wheel-legged Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While methods like MPC excel in precise vehicular trajectory control [88], challenges arise in scenarios with abrupt changes. Strategies like heuristic landing planners, dynamic foot positioning, and preference-driven controller optimization have enhanced robot efficiency [42], [89]. Additionally, advanced control frameworks like force-and-moment-based MPC and model hierarchy predictive control (MHPC), along with innovations like sensor-based active elastic hip joints and spring-based passive elastic knee/ankle joints, promise to optimize robotic stability and movements [44], [64].…”
Section: Stability and Locomotion In Bipedal Wheel-legged Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The support leg does not have enough kinetic energy to vault over the apex point where the model falls back (Crews and Travers 2020). • The model violates GRF constraints during locomotion phases.…”
Section: Tolerance To Single-step Terrain Disturbancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, by applying terrain disturbances to the openloop limit cycles, we determine the features of these cycles, enabling larger terrain disturbances. Consequently, motivated by the effectiveness of once-perstep control (Kim and Collins 2017) and energy management of biped locomotion (Crews and Travers 2020), we introduce a novel control mechanism that regulates the configuration and speed of the model by adjusting the precompression of the rotary ankle spring via energy feedback. The model is controlled only during the DS phase (once-per-step energy input through the ankle spring), allowing to benefit from the passive dynamics during the single stance phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various strategies for footstep selection. For example, there are methods of generating footstep reflecting joystick input commands [ 4 ], placing footstep controlling system energy for stable walking [ 5 ], and generating autonomous paths using planes detected by vision sensors. In addition, studies on an optimization-based path planner approach are being conducted [ 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%