In October 2016, an international challenge devoted to the energy management of a fuel cell/battery vehicle was launched during the 2016 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), in Hangzhou, China. The vehicle driving cost, which includes the hydrogen and the source degradation costs, was used as a base of comparison. Following the success of this first initiative, this paper analyses the best participant energy managements. It appeared that well designed Energy Management Strategies (EMS) lead to reduce significantly the trip cost while ill-designed EMS may lead to high fuel consumption or premature source degradations. Tight deadlines have deliberately limited the development times, but the best results are close to the theoretical dynamic programming optimum. Knowing in advance the mission profile also does not appears so important because the best developed strategies have quite similar results than for the dynamic programing optimal strategy.