1975
DOI: 10.3130/aijsaxx.235.0_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Input and Damages in Structures Subjected to Severe Earthquakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A more rational seismic design approach, which also overcomes this difficulty, is to express the dynamic input effect through energy response spectra. Interpreting the effect of earthquakes in terms of energy is gaining extensive attention [Housner, 1956;Berg, Tomaides, 1960;Kato, Akiyama, 1975;Housner, Jennings, 1977;Hall et al, 1984;Akiyama, 1985;Uang, Bertero, 1988 and1990;Kuwamura et al, 1994;Bruneau, Wang, 1996;Bertero et al, 1996;Yei, Otani, 1999;Chou et al, 2000;Chou, Uang, 2003;Adang 2007;Leelataviwat et al 2009;Jiao et al, 2011]. This approach features three major advantages: (i) the input effect in terms of energy and the structural resistance in terms of energy dissipation capacity are basically uncoupled, (ii) except in the short period range, the input energy, E I , introduced by a given ground motion in a structure is a stable quantity, governed primarily by the natural period T and the mass m, and scarcely by other structural properties such as resistance, damping and hysteretic behavior, and (iii) the consideration of the cumulative damage fits well with this formulation and can be directly addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more rational seismic design approach, which also overcomes this difficulty, is to express the dynamic input effect through energy response spectra. Interpreting the effect of earthquakes in terms of energy is gaining extensive attention [Housner, 1956;Berg, Tomaides, 1960;Kato, Akiyama, 1975;Housner, Jennings, 1977;Hall et al, 1984;Akiyama, 1985;Uang, Bertero, 1988 and1990;Kuwamura et al, 1994;Bruneau, Wang, 1996;Bertero et al, 1996;Yei, Otani, 1999;Chou et al, 2000;Chou, Uang, 2003;Adang 2007;Leelataviwat et al 2009;Jiao et al, 2011]. This approach features three major advantages: (i) the input effect in terms of energy and the structural resistance in terms of energy dissipation capacity are basically uncoupled, (ii) except in the short period range, the input energy, E I , introduced by a given ground motion in a structure is a stable quantity, governed primarily by the natural period T and the mass m, and scarcely by other structural properties such as resistance, damping and hysteretic behavior, and (iii) the consideration of the cumulative damage fits well with this formulation and can be directly addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shock was with high acceleration, long duration and be accompanied by many aftershocks. There were aftershocks with maximum acceleration over 300 cm/s 2 . Two stage of the earthquake intensity expected in the present seismic design code are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As was discussed in Nagao and Kanda (2013), in low frequency bands such as 0.1 -1.0 Hz, the DCF R approaches unity as σ decreases, while the opposite tendency can be observed in higher frequency bands. On the other hands, as for σ-DCF E relations, damping effect may be insignificant in any frequency ranges, as was discussed in Kato and Akiyama (1975). Linear regression model was chosen to represent each of the relationships.…”
Section: Damping Effects On Response Spectrum and Energy Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He verified the assumption using a few structural damage examples (Housner 1959). Kato and Akiyama (1975) showed that the total amount of energy (E) to structures depends mainly on the natural period T n and total mass m, not on the damping ratio and restoring force characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%