1985
DOI: 10.1119/1.14405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy in a one-dimensional small amplitude mechanical wave

Abstract: We present a discussion of the energy associated with a one-dimensional mechanical wave which has a small amplitude but is otherwise general. We consider the kinetic energy only briefly because the standard treatments are adequate. However, our treatment of the potential energy is substantially more general and complete than the treatments which appear in introductory and intermediate undergraduate level physics textbooks. Specifically, we present three different derivations of the potential energy density ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The matter of the energy of deformation of the taut string has also been subject to some critical examinations over the years. Matthews [16] derived the CURV equation, and also struggled with the ensuing non-uniqueness; the author did not realize that the expression for the density was wrong. Burko [17] derived the density of energy of deformation to arrive at the two versions of the energy density of [5], and then concluded that both expressions CURV and ELONG for the energy density were correct and that the ambiguity of the energy definitions did not matter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matter of the energy of deformation of the taut string has also been subject to some critical examinations over the years. Matthews [16] derived the CURV equation, and also struggled with the ensuing non-uniqueness; the author did not realize that the expression for the density was wrong. Burko [17] derived the density of energy of deformation to arrive at the two versions of the energy density of [5], and then concluded that both expressions CURV and ELONG for the energy density were correct and that the ambiguity of the energy definitions did not matter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach is to multiply the wave equation by the local string velocity and then use a differential identity to convert the resulting equation into an equation of the form of a continuity equation (e.g. section V of [12]). While such an approach can be generalized to take into account fully three-dimensional motion of elements of a string and not just purely transverse motion (section 5 of [7]), such derivations gloss over the fact that the differential identity one can use to obtain an equation of the right general form is not unique (see subsection 2.2), and so further physical reasoning is needed to determine which identity leads to the correct final equation.…”
Section: Mathematically Simple and Physically Transparent Derivation mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before leaving this section though, the following question might arise in readers' minds. Assuming that the potential energy density in a linearly elastic string is uniquely definable and that it is given by (8), one might wonder if the approach indicated by (12), of the three given above, does reliably give the right potential energy density. To see that it does not do so in all cases, consider purely longitudinal motion on a linearly elastic taut string for which the wave equation (10) simplifies to recalling that ξ (X, t ) represents the longitudinal displacement of a point in the string whose equilibrium x-coordinate is X. Multiplying 17byξ and then using the differential identity,…”
Section: The Problem With Trying To Derive the Energy Continuity Equamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this situation, the energy density per unit length at a point x is the sum of a kinetic and of an elastic term, 12,20 U͑x,t ͒ϭ 1 2…”
Section: ͑5͒mentioning
confidence: 99%