2003
DOI: 10.1119/1.1575765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What happens to energy and momentum when two oppositely-moving wave pulses overlap?

Abstract: The overlap of two wave pulses that are moving in opposite directions along the same line in a linear, nondissipative and nondispersive medium is used to discuss the compatibility of wave superposition and of energy-momentum conservation. What happens to the energy and to the momentum when the pulses overlap in such a situation is examined. The treatment is applicable to electromagnetic waves or to small-amplitude linear mechanical waves on an ideal string. It is argued that introductory-to-intermediate textbo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following explanation of this paradox was suggested by Kislev and Vaidman [KV02]: They claim that there is another energy term missed in the above analysis, which is related to the interference of electromagnetic waves emitted by the two particles 62 and which restores the energy balance. This explanation does not look plausible, because there is actually no interaction energy associated with the interference of light waves: The interference results in a redistribution of the wave's amplitude (formation of minima and maxima) and the wave's local energy in space, while the total energy of the wave remains unchanged [Gau03]. In other words, there is no interaction between photons.…”
Section: Kislev-vaidman "Paradox"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following explanation of this paradox was suggested by Kislev and Vaidman [KV02]: They claim that there is another energy term missed in the above analysis, which is related to the interference of electromagnetic waves emitted by the two particles 62 and which restores the energy balance. This explanation does not look plausible, because there is actually no interaction energy associated with the interference of light waves: The interference results in a redistribution of the wave's amplitude (formation of minima and maxima) and the wave's local energy in space, while the total energy of the wave remains unchanged [Gau03]. In other words, there is no interaction between photons.…”
Section: Kislev-vaidman "Paradox"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8] the double slit interference with monochromatic waves 7 is analyzed and it is said that energy-momentum is conserved only after spatial average. On the other hand, e.g., [4] shows that Eq. (9) is the correct one for the case of two plane 5 See Figure 1 for the defintion of regions B 1 , B 2 , B 3 , B ′ 3 , C 1 ,C 2 , C ′ 1 and C ′ 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [26] and also [3]. 4 Notice that Ta = T ab θ b , where T ab are the components of the usual [15] energymomentum tensor of Maxwell theory. Discussions about the appropriateness for the use of the usual energy-momentum tensor for the description of energy-momentum propagation are given in [15,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%