2005
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2005)131:10(1252)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Efficiency for Standard Penetration Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0
18

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
40
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the authors observed that the hammer drop height may vary due to operator execution procedures. In the present work, the hammer drop height was strictly controlled and maintained the standard value of 0.75 m. Therefore, E R values higher than 100% can be justified by the additional potential energy of the hammer and rods due to the sampler penetration into the soil (Odebrecht et al, 2005).…”
Section: Energy Ratio (E R )mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the authors observed that the hammer drop height may vary due to operator execution procedures. In the present work, the hammer drop height was strictly controlled and maintained the standard value of 0.75 m. Therefore, E R values higher than 100% can be justified by the additional potential energy of the hammer and rods due to the sampler penetration into the soil (Odebrecht et al, 2005).…”
Section: Energy Ratio (E R )mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this research, two instrumented subassemblies were built, similar to the one developed by Odebrecht et al (2005). Each instrumented subassembly consists of one segment of rod, to which a pair of accelerometers and one load cell have been installed (Fig.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations