1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61936-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Dissipation in the Ultraprecision Machining of Copper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
36
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This experimental study showed that the nominal rake angle and the tool edge profile significantly affect the forces. In another experimental study [21], it was seen that at lower uncut chip thickness values closer to the tool edge radius, the energy consumed in the shear zone alone was unable to account for the size effect in specific cutting energy. This anomaly was attributed to sliding at the tool-work interface and ploughing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This experimental study showed that the nominal rake angle and the tool edge profile significantly affect the forces. In another experimental study [21], it was seen that at lower uncut chip thickness values closer to the tool edge radius, the energy consumed in the shear zone alone was unable to account for the size effect in specific cutting energy. This anomaly was attributed to sliding at the tool-work interface and ploughing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The chips will be generated, and material removal will be achieved only when the uncut chip thickness reaches a critical value, the so-called minimum chip thickness [69]. Minimum (or critical) uncut chip thickness is considered to be a measure of the highest attainable accuracy [70,71]. No chip is produced with a chip thickness less than a critical value, and the entire material is forced under the cutting tool and deformed.…”
Section: Size Effects In Micro-machining Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contact length l C was obtained from the relief angle of the tool and the spring back due to the elastic recovery occurring on the flank face by Arcona and Dow's model [12]. The contact length l C can be ob- tained with the following Eq.…”
Section: Micro Cutting Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%