2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/8899355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Dissipation and Particle Size Distribution of Granite under Different Incident Energies in SHPB Compression Tests

Abstract: To investigate energy dissipation and particle size distribution of rock under dynamic loads, a series of dynamic compression tests of granite specimens were conducted using a conventional split-Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) device with a high-speed camera. The experimental results show that the dissipated energy increases linearly with an increasing incident energy, following two different inclined paths connected by a critical incident energy, and the linear energy dissipation law in the dynamic compression … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Static compression tests with regular cylindrical specimens by Xie et al (2009) showed that as more energy was absorbed by a rock specimen, more and smaller fragments were produced from the specimen. Gong et al (2020) found that there was a critical absorbed energy of 0.36-0.41 MJ/m 3 for the granite tested in a Hopkinson pressure bar. As the absorbed energy by a rock specimen was smaller than this critical energy, the rock specimen would Zhang et al 2000Zhang et al , 2001 not be broken.…”
Section: Uniaxial Compression Testsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Static compression tests with regular cylindrical specimens by Xie et al (2009) showed that as more energy was absorbed by a rock specimen, more and smaller fragments were produced from the specimen. Gong et al (2020) found that there was a critical absorbed energy of 0.36-0.41 MJ/m 3 for the granite tested in a Hopkinson pressure bar. As the absorbed energy by a rock specimen was smaller than this critical energy, the rock specimen would Zhang et al 2000Zhang et al , 2001 not be broken.…”
Section: Uniaxial Compression Testsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Li et al [17] proposed a test method for dynamic compression strength of rocks under prestatic load and measured the dynamic compression strength of sandstone under preload, and the results showed that the dynamic compression strength of the specimen under preload was higher than its compression strength under pure static load or pure dynamic load. Gong et al [18] found that the dissipation energy increased linearly with the increase of incident energy by conducting SHPB tests, and the linear energy dissipation law in dynamic compression tests was confirmed by connecting two different inclined paths by a critical incident energy. Yang et al [19] conducted impact compression tests on samples of red sandstone, gray sandstone, and granite, which are common in rock engineering, with different impact velocities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In formula (7), it can be seen that the cumulative mass of any crushed body with a particle size smaller than r 0 in the crushed body can be expressed as follows:…”
Section: Principles Of Shpb Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ping et al [2] used the SHPB test device to carry out impact tests on limestone at room temperature and between 100 °C and 800 °C to study the influence of temperature changes on the stress-strain curve and strength parameters. Zhang et al [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] used the improved Hopkinson test equipment to conduct conventional uniaxial impact tests on dolomite, granite, phyllite, and marble; the dynamic mechanical properties of ore and rock were studied from the stressstrain curve, failure morphology, energy distribution, and fractal dimension. Ma et al [11][12][13] conducted dynamic impact tests on artificially frozen sand and shale under active confining pressure, and the changes of stress-strain curves and strength parameters with confining pressure and strain rate were studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%