2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy density and storage capacity cost comparison of conceptual solid and liquid sorption seasonal heat storage systems for low-temperature space heating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One advantage of the magnesium chloride system is the cost efficiency. Scapino et al . stated that one ton of magnesium chloride costs 154 €.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One advantage of the magnesium chloride system is the cost efficiency. Scapino et al . stated that one ton of magnesium chloride costs 154 €.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practical applications of different long-term/seasonal sorption heat storage systems have been widely discussed and analyzed [30,31]. The most researches are focused on the system energy density, economic considerations, reactor design, and so on.…”
Section: Further Discussion On the Potential Application And Existingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principle advantages of the thermochemical way of energy storage over sensible and latent ones are the high energy storage density and the absence of thermal losses [12]. However, the beginner level of the technological maturity results in the high seasonal storage capacity cost of 0.6 to 1.4 €/kWh for the building sector [13,14], where the biggest rate of capital investments goes to the solid material [15,16]. Nevertheless, there is a steady technological advancement in the design of large or pilot scale solid sorption seasonal systems over laboratory prototypes, comparing the period from 2009 [17] to 2017 [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of thermochemical reactor prototypes and components can be found in [11,25]. Scapino et al [14] showed that although the energy storage density does not differ too much between open and closed sorption fixed-bed reactors, the storage capacity costs (€/kWh) are lower for open sorption technology. However, this technology is only reserved for use with moist air.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%