2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy balance and partition in Inner Mongolia steppe ecosystems with different land use types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
68
1
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
17
68
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The EBR results for the Skukuza eddy covariance system, which vary between 0.76 and 1.09 with an annual mean of 0.93 (only the years with high-quality data), are generally within the reported accuracies as shown in most studies that report the energy balance closure error at 10-30 %, across different ecosystems. For instance, Wilson et al (2002) also recorded an annual mean EBR of 0.84, ranging between 0.34 and 1.69 in an extensive study investigating 22 FLUXNET sites across the globe; EBR in ChinaFLUX sites ranged between 0.58 and 1.00, with a mean of 0.83 (Yuling et al, 2005); according to Were et al (2007), EBR values of about 0.90 were found over shrub and herbaceous patches in a dry valley in southeast Spain, whereas Chen et al (2009) showed a mean of 0.98 EBR for their study in the semi-arid region of Mongolia, and an EBR value of 0.80 was found by Xin and Liu (2010) in a maize crop in semi-arid conditions, in China. Using data from the Tibetan Observation and Research Platform (TORP), Liu et al (2011) observed an EBR value of 0.85 in an alfalfa field in semi-arid China.…”
Section: Surface Energy Balance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EBR results for the Skukuza eddy covariance system, which vary between 0.76 and 1.09 with an annual mean of 0.93 (only the years with high-quality data), are generally within the reported accuracies as shown in most studies that report the energy balance closure error at 10-30 %, across different ecosystems. For instance, Wilson et al (2002) also recorded an annual mean EBR of 0.84, ranging between 0.34 and 1.69 in an extensive study investigating 22 FLUXNET sites across the globe; EBR in ChinaFLUX sites ranged between 0.58 and 1.00, with a mean of 0.83 (Yuling et al, 2005); according to Were et al (2007), EBR values of about 0.90 were found over shrub and herbaceous patches in a dry valley in southeast Spain, whereas Chen et al (2009) showed a mean of 0.98 EBR for their study in the semi-arid region of Mongolia, and an EBR value of 0.80 was found by Xin and Liu (2010) in a maize crop in semi-arid conditions, in China. Using data from the Tibetan Observation and Research Platform (TORP), Liu et al (2011) observed an EBR value of 0.85 in an alfalfa field in semi-arid China.…”
Section: Surface Energy Balance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…net radiation minus soil heat flux, is equal to the sum of the turbulent fluxes (Rn − G = LE + H); however, in most instances, the measured available energy is larger than the sum of the measured turbulent fluxes of sensible heat and latent heat. Extensive research on the issue of surface energy imbalance in EC observations has been done (Barr et al, 2012;Chen et al, 2009;Foken et al, 2010;Franssen et al, 2010;Mauder et al, 2007), and closure error (or imbalance) has been documented to be around 10-30 % (Wilson et al, 2002;von Randow et al, 2004;Sánchez et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grassland ecosystem, one of the most widespread arid and semiarid vegetation forms, occupies 20 % of the global terrestrial area and plays an important role in the global carbon cycle (Scurlock and Hall 1998), water cycle (Hu et al 2009), and energy balance (Chen et al 2009a). China has the second largest area of grassland in the world covering 3.92 million km 2 or about 16.3 % of the global grassland area (Fan et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Xilinhot, which is located at the northern edge Soils of the study site are divided into chestnut or chernozem soil, according to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) classification. In Xilinhot, which is located at the northern edge of the Chinese pastoral farming ecotone, grazing is the primary land-use pattern [27,28]. There are also two alternative land uses of the steppe in the region: grazing-exclusion steppe and steppe reclaimed to cropland.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the CUE definition and Re composition mentioned above, it likely that the Ra intensity and its proportion of Re play a critical role in ecosystem CUE regulation. Meanwhile, it has already been determined that the vegetation structure and characteristics, biomass and respiration and their composition are usually substantially changed under different management patterns [6,27]. However, it remains uncertain how and to what extent the grassland-use patterns changes would influence the regional ecosystems CUE in the North China steppes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%