1995
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.51.2256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy and angular distributions of electrons from ion impact on atomic and molecular hydrogen. II. 20–114-keVH++H

Abstract: Results of crossed-beam measurements of cross sections differential in ejected electron energy and angle for ionization of atomic hydrogen by 20-1 14-keV protons are reported. Secondary electrons were measured over an energy range of 1.5-300 eV and an angular range of 15"-165". Atomic-hydrogen targets were produced in a radio-frequency discharge source with a dissociation fraction of about 74%. Ratios of cross sections for H targets to those for Hz targets were obtained from measurements on the mixed target. F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(18 reference statements)
3
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Differential cross section experimental results are available; in particular the momentum distribution of ejected electrons. Here, in contrast to charge transfer cross sections, CTMC and CDW calculations have generally been found to be in excellent agreement with each other and, to the point, experiment Kerby III et al, 1995). CTMC and CDW calculations are particularly convenient as they produce differential cross sections directly, whereas in FHBS and FE calculations a projection onto some appropriate momentum eigenstates must be performed.…”
Section: Differential Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Differential cross section experimental results are available; in particular the momentum distribution of ejected electrons. Here, in contrast to charge transfer cross sections, CTMC and CDW calculations have generally been found to be in excellent agreement with each other and, to the point, experiment Kerby III et al, 1995). CTMC and CDW calculations are particularly convenient as they produce differential cross sections directly, whereas in FHBS and FE calculations a projection onto some appropriate momentum eigenstates must be performed.…”
Section: Differential Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The cited work notwithstanding, we report here a different way of extracting differential electron cross sections from finite Hilbert basis-set (FHBS) calculations [1]; this incorporates a quantal ionization process wherein the outgoing ejected electron diffracts past the target and projectile protons. This gives rise to an interference bringing theory and experiment [9] into agreement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Perhaps one reason for this is the quite remarkable successes of the classical trajectory Monte Carlo (CTMC) algorithm [2] and the continuum distorted wave (CDW) approximation [3]; they reproduce the Rudd group data over a wide range of proton energies [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absolute experimental data are due to Ref. [23] where comparison with other theories can be found.…”
Section: Three-body Coupling Via Momentum Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%